From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1473081421-16555-18-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> References: <1473081421-16555-1-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> <1473081421-16555-18-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> From: Emil Velikov Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:18:48 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 17/19] drm/virtio: kconfig: Fix recursive dependency issue. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 To: Peter Griffin Cc: LAKML , "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" , kernel@stlinux.com, vinod.koul@intel.com, patrice.chotard@st.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, David Airlie , Gerd Hoffmann , ohad@wizery.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, devicetree , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, ML dri-devel , "open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER" , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, lee.jones@linaro.org List-ID: On 5 September 2016 at 14:16, Peter Griffin wrote: > ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC must select REMOTEPROC, which exposes the following > recursive dependency. > >>From a humble skim through remoteproc, drm and a few other subsystems I think the above is wrong. All the drivers (outside of remoteproc), that I've seen, depend on the core component, they don't select it. Furthermore most places explicitly hide the drivers from the menu if the core component isn't enabled. Is there something that requires such a different/unusual behaviour in remoteproc ? Regards, Emil From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752159AbcISXSx (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:18:53 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]:35457 "EHLO mail-wm0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750730AbcISXSu (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:18:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1473081421-16555-18-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> References: <1473081421-16555-1-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> <1473081421-16555-18-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> From: Emil Velikov Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:18:48 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 17/19] drm/virtio: kconfig: Fix recursive dependency issue. To: Peter Griffin Cc: LAKML , "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" , kernel@stlinux.com, vinod.koul@intel.com, patrice.chotard@st.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, David Airlie , Gerd Hoffmann , ohad@wizery.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, devicetree , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, ML dri-devel , "open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER" , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, lee.jones@linaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5 September 2016 at 14:16, Peter Griffin wrote: > ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC must select REMOTEPROC, which exposes the following > recursive dependency. > >>From a humble skim through remoteproc, drm and a few other subsystems I think the above is wrong. All the drivers (outside of remoteproc), that I've seen, depend on the core component, they don't select it. Furthermore most places explicitly hide the drivers from the menu if the core component isn't enabled. Is there something that requires such a different/unusual behaviour in remoteproc ? Regards, Emil From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Emil Velikov Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 17/19] drm/virtio: kconfig: Fix recursive dependency issue. Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:18:48 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1473081421-16555-1-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> <1473081421-16555-18-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1473081421-16555-18-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Peter Griffin Cc: devicetree , kernel@stlinux.com, vinod.koul@intel.com, lee.jones@linaro.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, patrice.chotard@st.com, ML dri-devel , "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" , David Airlie , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, "open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER" , LAKML List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 5 September 2016 at 14:16, Peter Griffin wrote: > ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC must select REMOTEPROC, which exposes the following > recursive dependency. > >>From a humble skim through remoteproc, drm and a few other subsystems I think the above is wrong. All the drivers (outside of remoteproc), that I've seen, depend on the core component, they don't select it. Furthermore most places explicitly hide the drivers from the menu if the core component isn't enabled. Is there something that requires such a different/unusual behaviour in remoteproc ? Regards, Emil From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Emil Velikov Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 17/19] drm/virtio: kconfig: Fix recursive dependency issue. Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:18:48 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1473081421-16555-1-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> <1473081421-16555-18-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1473081421-16555-18-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Peter Griffin Cc: devicetree , kernel@stlinux.com, vinod.koul@intel.com, lee.jones@linaro.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, patrice.chotard@st.com, ML dri-devel , "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" , David Airlie , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, "open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER" , LAKML List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 5 September 2016 at 14:16, Peter Griffin wrote: > ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC must select REMOTEPROC, which exposes the following > recursive dependency. > >From a humble skim through remoteproc, drm and a few other subsystems I think the above is wrong. All the drivers (outside of remoteproc), that I've seen, depend on the core component, they don't select it. Furthermore most places explicitly hide the drivers from the menu if the core component isn't enabled. Is there something that requires such a different/unusual behaviour in remoteproc ? Regards, Emil From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: emil.l.velikov@gmail.com (Emil Velikov) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:18:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v9 17/19] drm/virtio: kconfig: Fix recursive dependency issue. In-Reply-To: <1473081421-16555-18-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> References: <1473081421-16555-1-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> <1473081421-16555-18-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 5 September 2016 at 14:16, Peter Griffin wrote: > ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC must select REMOTEPROC, which exposes the following > recursive dependency. > >>From a humble skim through remoteproc, drm and a few other subsystems I think the above is wrong. All the drivers (outside of remoteproc), that I've seen, depend on the core component, they don't select it. Furthermore most places explicitly hide the drivers from the menu if the core component isn't enabled. Is there something that requires such a different/unusual behaviour in remoteproc ? Regards, Emil