From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: devicetree repository separation/migration Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 21:09:53 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20140217180544.GU7862@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20140218155750.GS17250@pengutronix.de> <20140218181854.GB7862@titan.lakedaemon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140218181854.GB7862-u4khhh1J0LxI1Ri9qeTfzeTW4wlIGRCZ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-spec-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Cooper Cc: Sascha Hauer , Rob Herring , Ian Campbell , =?UTF-8?Q?Pawe=C5=82_Moll?= , Mark Rutland , Kumar Gala , Rob Landley , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , devicetree-spec-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-compiler-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:57:50PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: >> It will be interesting to see which rules should apply for merging new >> bindings. I know that devicetrees should be OS agnostic, but sometimes >> they are modelled after how Linux currently works. What happens when the >> *BSD guys have different ideas how a good binding looks like? How will >> such conflicts be resolved? > > That's more a question for Grant. I assume we'll all put on our big-boy > pants and pick the best technical solution based on their merits. :) I think you've answered it pretty competently. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree-spec" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html