From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <glikely@secretlab.ca>
Received: from mail-gx0-f170.google.com (mail-gx0-f170.google.com
	[209.85.161.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 876C81007D4
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Sat,  9 Jul 2011 12:42:32 +1000 (EST)
Received: by gxk27 with SMTP id 27so1396605gxk.15
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 19:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: glikely@secretlab.ca
In-Reply-To: <CAOZdJXVp5LHqYEMoqpnKEkuWyuE6kwU+Z9VwUYLPcz-+h_gqfw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9F6FE96B71CF29479FF1CDC8046E150316EAB6@039-SN1MPN1-003.039d.mgd.msft.net>
	<CAOZdJXVp5LHqYEMoqpnKEkuWyuE6kwU+Z9VwUYLPcz-+h_gqfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 20:42:29 -0600
Message-ID: <CACxGe6v_xr=1ro+g=CaAqZNd5sF0+V55gtOjVJa1dw=W6WUYMg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: top level compatibles for virtual platforms
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@freescale.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@freescale.com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Gala Kumar-B11780 <B11780@freescale.com>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Friday, July 8, 2011, Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@freescale.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Yoder Stuart-B08248
> <B08248@freescale.com> wrote:
>
>> =A0 "MPC85xxDS" - for a virtual machine for the e500v2 type platforms
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 and would support 85xx targets, plus P20=
20, P1022,etc
>>
>> =A0 "corenet-32-ds" - for a virtual machine similar to the 32-bit P4080
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 platforms
>>
>> =A0 "corenet-64-ds" - for a virtual machine based on a 64-bit corenet
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 platform
>
> I think we should drop the "DS" because that's a name applied to
> certain Freescale reference boards.
>
> Is being a CoreNet board really something meaningful with respect to
> KVM? =A0I don't see the connection.
>
> Also, if these are KVM creations, shouldn't there be a "kvm" in the
> compatible string somewhere?

I would say so. That would accurately describe the execution environment.

>
> --
> Timur Tabi
> Linux kernel developer at Freescale
>

--=20
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.