All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
To: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.ibm.com>,
	naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/28] powerpc/xmon: Move breakpoint instructions to own array
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 15:52:55 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACzsE9o9zF670T0y7tUsWnuk75ycwFXW+MjA0d050sS3uvZ8-w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2060873.nxaIYQu1l1@townsend>

On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 3:41 PM Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au> wrote:
>
> On Friday, 1 May 2020 1:41:54 PM AEST Jordan Niethe wrote:
> > To execute an instruction out of line after a breakpoint, the NIP is set
> > to the address of struct bpt::instr. Here a copy of the instruction that
> > was replaced with a breakpoint is kept, along with a trap so normal flow
> > can be resumed after XOLing. The struct bpt's are located within the
> > data section. This is problematic as the data section may be marked as
> > no execute.
> >
> > Instead of each struct bpt holding the instructions to be XOL'd, make a
> > new array, bpt_table[], with enough space to hold instructions for the
> > number of supported breakpoints. A later patch will move this to the
> > text section.
> > Make struct bpt::instr a pointer to the instructions in bpt_table[]
> > associated with that breakpoint. This association is a simple mapping:
> > bpts[n] -> bpt_table[n * words per breakpoint]. Currently we only need
> > the copied instruction followed by a trap, so 2 words per breakpoint.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > v4: New to series
> > v5: - Do not use __section(), use a .space directive in .S file
> >     - Simplify in_breakpoint_table() calculation
> >     - Define BPT_SIZE
> > v6: - Seperate moving to text section
> > ---
> >  arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
> > index f91ae2c9adbe..6ba7f66c1dd0 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
> > @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static long *xmon_fault_jmp[NR_CPUS];
> >  /* Breakpoint stuff */
> >  struct bpt {
> >       unsigned long   address;
> > -     unsigned int    instr[2];
> > +     unsigned int    *instr;
> >       atomic_t        ref_count;
> >       int             enabled;
> >       unsigned long   pad;
> > @@ -117,6 +117,10 @@ static unsigned bpinstr = 0x7fe00008;    /* trap */
> >
> >  #define BP_NUM(bp)   ((bp) - bpts + 1)
> >
> > +#define BPT_SIZE       (sizeof(unsigned int) * 2)
> > +#define BPT_WORDS      (BPT_SIZE / sizeof(unsigned int))
>
> Minor nit-pick but IMHO this would be more logical if you defined BPT_WORDS
> first like so:
>
> #define BPT_WORDS      (2)
> #define BPT_SIZE       (sizeof(unsigned int) * BPT_WORDS)
>
> Otherwise this looks good and I think the offset calculations below are correct
> so:
What I was thinking was BPT_SIZE  would later be defined in terms the
instruction type and by doing it this way
 BPT_WORDS  would be correct for the the instruction type if like on
ppc32, it did not include a suffix.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
>
> > +static unsigned int bpt_table[NBPTS * BPT_WORDS];
> > +
> >  /* Prototypes */
> >  static int cmds(struct pt_regs *);
> >  static int mread(unsigned long, void *, int);
> > @@ -854,15 +858,13 @@ static struct bpt *in_breakpoint_table(unsigned long
> > nip, unsigned long *offp) {
> >       unsigned long off;
> >
> > -     off = nip - (unsigned long) bpts;
> > -     if (off >= sizeof(bpts))
> > +     off = nip - (unsigned long) bpt_table;
> > +     if (off >= sizeof(bpt_table))
> >               return NULL;
> > -     off %= sizeof(struct bpt);
> > -     if (off != offsetof(struct bpt, instr[0])
> > -         && off != offsetof(struct bpt, instr[1]))
> > +     *offp = off % BPT_SIZE;
> > +     if (*offp != 0 && *offp != 4)
> >               return NULL;
> > -     *offp = off - offsetof(struct bpt, instr[0]);
> > -     return (struct bpt *) (nip - off);
> > +     return bpts + (off / BPT_SIZE);
> >  }
> >
> >  static struct bpt *new_breakpoint(unsigned long a)
> > @@ -877,7 +879,8 @@ static struct bpt *new_breakpoint(unsigned long a)
> >       for (bp = bpts; bp < &bpts[NBPTS]; ++bp) {
> >               if (!bp->enabled && atomic_read(&bp->ref_count) == 0) {
> >                       bp->address = a;
> > -                     patch_instruction(&bp->instr[1], bpinstr);
> > +                     bp->instr = bpt_table + ((bp - bpts) * BPT_WORDS);
> > +                     patch_instruction(bp->instr + 1, bpinstr);
> >                       return bp;
> >               }
> >       }
>
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-04  5:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-01  3:41 [PATCH v7 00/28] Initial Prefixed Instruction support Jordan Niethe
2020-05-01  3:41 ` [PATCH v7 01/28] powerpc/xmon: Remove store_inst() for patch_instruction() Jordan Niethe
2020-05-01  3:41 ` [PATCH v7 02/28] powerpc/xmon: Move breakpoint instructions to own array Jordan Niethe
2020-05-04  5:41   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-04  5:52     ` Jordan Niethe [this message]
2020-05-01  3:41 ` [PATCH v7 03/28] powerpc/xmon: Move breakpoints to text section Jordan Niethe
2020-05-01  3:41 ` [PATCH v7 04/28] powerpc/xmon: Use bitwise calculations in_breakpoint_table() Jordan Niethe
2020-05-04  5:41   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-05  7:08   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-05-05  7:31     ` Jordan Niethe
2020-05-01  3:41 ` [PATCH v7 05/28] powerpc: Change calling convention for create_branch() et. al Jordan Niethe
2020-05-04  2:55   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-01  3:41 ` [PATCH v7 06/28] powerpc: Use a macro for creating instructions from u32s Jordan Niethe
2020-05-04  5:54   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-01  3:41 ` [PATCH v7 07/28] powerpc: Use an accessor for instructions Jordan Niethe
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 08/28] powerpc: Use a function for getting the instruction op code Jordan Niethe
2020-05-04  8:01   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 09/28] powerpc: Use a function for byte swapping instructions Jordan Niethe
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 10/28] powerpc: Introduce functions for instruction equality Jordan Niethe
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 11/28] powerpc: Use a datatype for instructions Jordan Niethe
2020-05-02 14:29   ` kbuild test robot
2020-05-02 14:29     ` kbuild test robot
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 12/28] powerpc: Use a function for reading instructions Jordan Niethe
2020-05-04  8:26   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 13/28] powerpc: Add a probe_user_read_inst() function Jordan Niethe
2020-05-04  8:30   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 14/28] powerpc: Add a probe_kernel_read_inst() function Jordan Niethe
2020-05-04  9:24   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 15/28] powerpc/kprobes: Use patch_instruction() Jordan Niethe
2020-05-05  1:41   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 16/28] powerpc: Define and use __get_user_instr{, inatomic}() Jordan Niethe
2020-05-05  1:46   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 17/28] powerpc: Introduce a function for reporting instruction length Jordan Niethe
2020-05-05  2:02   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 18/28] powerpc/xmon: Use a function for reading instructions Jordan Niethe
2020-05-05  2:07   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 19/28] powerpc/xmon: Move insertion of breakpoint for xol'ing Jordan Niethe
2020-05-05  2:19   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 20/28] powerpc: Make test_translate_branch() independent of instruction length Jordan Niethe
2020-05-05  2:40   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 21/28] powerpc: Enable Prefixed Instructions Jordan Niethe
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 22/28] powerpc: Define new SRR1 bits for a future ISA version Jordan Niethe
2020-05-05  2:49   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 23/28] powerpc: Add prefixed instructions to instruction data type Jordan Niethe
2020-05-05  6:04   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 24/28] powerpc: Test prefixed code patching Jordan Niethe
2020-05-05  6:08   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 25/28] powerpc: Test prefixed instructions in feature fixups Jordan Niethe
2020-05-05  7:15   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-05  7:34     ` Jordan Niethe
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 26/28] powerpc: Support prefixed instructions in alignment handler Jordan Niethe
2020-05-05  7:17   ` Alistair Popple
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 27/28] powerpc sstep: Add support for prefixed load/stores Jordan Niethe
2020-05-01  3:42 ` [PATCH v7 28/28] powerpc sstep: Add support for prefixed fixed-point arithmetic Jordan Niethe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACzsE9o9zF670T0y7tUsWnuk75ycwFXW+MjA0d050sS3uvZ8-w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jniethe5@gmail.com \
    --cc=alistair@popple.id.au \
    --cc=bala24@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dja@axtens.net \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.