From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YqRYQ-0004ws-S8 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 07 May 2015 19:33:55 +0000 Received: by laat2 with SMTP id t2so38144727laa.1 for ; Thu, 07 May 2015 12:33:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Pushpal Sidhu Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 12:33:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cannot achieve throughput higher than 460Mbps using CT firmware and 3x3 ath10k List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: richard mayers Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:01 AM, richard mayers wrote: > Its only 30% of CPU usage when I am transmit at maximum speed. May be > I am not checking it correctly, I just use top and then press 1 and it > splits the cores (it has only 2). In the worst case if 30% was the > average it should be a maximum of 60% in one single core. And you're getting your 30% CPU usage from (100 - IDLE), correct? Don't just look at the 'us' column. Going back to over drive on the chains, instead of mucking around with antenna orientation and distance, I would go out and buy some attenuators and put them between the channels. Then change the tx power on the AP until you're absolutely tuned up. Otherwise, these tests are somewhat moot in my opinion. - Pushpal > Richard. _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k