From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=google.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::230; helo=mail-it0-x230.google.com; envelope-from=andresoportus@google.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="HMaKMlmC"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-it0-x230.google.com (mail-it0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40l4nn3J6wzF3Yf for ; Tue, 15 May 2018 01:47:05 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-it0-x230.google.com with SMTP id e185-v6so4038529ita.0 for ; Mon, 14 May 2018 08:47:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5UNm1dHfCmEE3ognSTXgZ023/gR7oHXET1lATR3kjE8=; b=HMaKMlmC6pNCTVtQiXUviZ1kixY5RutNRNJBO46v2fjM9Y9Wc3+LDP9jShilb6QyDz rcGi2f1De150ChZ2hdyyVEF4D5XMDoHEXIH3jAGkcbubYgoz2bs8xUnCEEysFDl3waGB jHxh6JAld6f8ga7xNHfwG22zYidNr2xGyc8IQkkfUnDKUfIYaLfMWw5Evbj6FDSkF11W G32gZqhrNzkBFCLRYvWxmJ9jOw5AXl0/aBxb1h7d5TfPjhC7X5tyyDOr6zMz3Us9KCW4 jsOBeVbquDOrLGPWIqfdVWKALpXBAQckzRzNpg7EBteCBcwjPk7UJLjUe5QOjpqcM9+L 1Pgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5UNm1dHfCmEE3ognSTXgZ023/gR7oHXET1lATR3kjE8=; b=H44DhWUZYelAICUZk7Tak7an03GAKGkyPPW2kAFKmj9ouKy23yjHFUYi0RTh4/8wMx BX20Kc7dnURflRYIfmfhPZyysRF3g8sQUvVl9Df+KkURvqsjgnDubYyL177iOFdEQR8J YZ/0TCuv+SLxGcxGWcRrFxGMkNwM+gOWVfUCiDIjTCFanLnOVlR+7uhVeDNuEEtX8I3Y kIUUxQJLPAPSD4jyU3p3qwVSNW/rbV1jlxRJGv8rsTlXDgULnFWO8m0ttWeqMsNGh2z+ vCJCx8BHCI9vo02vm7e8WOLQxdpTbW3WMsoxE+wsHoVw312hcMulf9swHoREUzQdJWxg ry3w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwcMOxwc4QztXkak6HQKV/0NmLCZObYX3b2GhDX1INJw0xHPmdUT T95LqmJsyqUT1VMZU+TmUnsRHNobYwniHTbjAVmnyL2b X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqG6k7syGffjkVkYkACa/Y7bkPUlQRyLKNuNYpjH1FxolAmyI8noPjJymmwtQ+cjIFLDdtSNme8rI3UN3MzsVI= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:590a:: with SMTP id n10-v6mr10882313iob.228.1526312822732; Mon, 14 May 2018 08:47:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Andres Oportus Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 08:46:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Question on States monitoring To: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 15:47:10 -0000 Are there any ongoing efforts on expanding States (say provided by GPIOs) monitoring/management? I see that phosphor-state-manager has Chassis/Host/BMC states that are placed onto DBUS but not a more generic mechanism. On the GPIO specific side, I see that phosphor-gpio-monitor allows for interrupt driven GPIO monitoring (seemly only used under a gpio-keys driver with /dev/input for Power's checkstop monitoring?), but no generic GPIO setting/getting for those not allowing interrupt type monitoring (say output GPIOs). Thanks, Andres