From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553BAC433EF for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 13:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234155AbhLHNS2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2021 08:18:28 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:20454 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234142AbhLHNS1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2021 08:18:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1638969295; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5BefnaS2nSDTkIemFZysrfU8x7ykoBKhJ8nWicX2wdE=; b=GlphEjHgQHiB614q0Q0IoYlQA0m5sLIXuJMgL0tQYLazZ6MD+t6u0TlTtQJ8L+G0AL7QZR vRMpuHzmK/kkX5zltzIxVPA4HUzyDjBFCLxV9lk+S+oIO5agYGs9rYtzG9Q3wRbM0jDjCx tcb6rS8sUfuir4FMeieTOCo6sISzEEg= Received: from mail-lj1-f200.google.com (mail-lj1-f200.google.com [209.85.208.200]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-595-Bl-BpSPXMkqn0Ef2_8j-qQ-1; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 08:14:54 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Bl-BpSPXMkqn0Ef2_8j-qQ-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f200.google.com with SMTP id 83-20020a2e0556000000b00218db3260bdso719431ljf.9 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 05:14:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5BefnaS2nSDTkIemFZysrfU8x7ykoBKhJ8nWicX2wdE=; b=C8IpV9CMjPNsTeIP3ryOYPlidaCwhos3EEPliHgLPY/I09+m7LNkrvWe+cy/mp9oOS 2JJmDJhTNatupGEf+Q+eItffI0YKqb3VgWx8aGVd/SEL2CaJ246ENSKP1AZuSUBks4A3 Yfvw6luDjLr4nTZ2voW98YGhVDpsy4mFrS1bTkpYw37IX4nLkYw5paC9nQZY2oCqHoBM jYjU2yZK/r2B+V+VnnuIrE8ryh20ZiodsPfhscM0y1YOLpDYlRVC+kRTs0cLMhPC975t iz7axS+wNSQaC9zgrPNlnHmW5M4Zn4huAwKSeGLrrg+eWlRz2RkGyHRlKCs0aLwQ8rg4 r+1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qjiSHyl4+zabJtCXgOEOrFC+VtSVFcCtzSoaIgD+IDn4HuzQn K8LZfy2lMHwak6Sm2bLgigV+pZ/guq517WWLwAGXHUxvBzp8+7QBLebysrBp7MXtboxsNrBdwxQ WqJZ6uHFxfm5Mxc0u8bGjW6Uggcy/vfoKDGJH8nNE X-Received: by 2002:a2e:5c04:: with SMTP id q4mr49841305ljb.334.1638969292986; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 05:14:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyugEfiRIOQkZEu7BUBsd8M6hitOdeGayCxRluKGR8B8A3YP8b6MQw3ScrlOwtpOiNshZ/qIoRHIb0CnvshZ2c= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:5c04:: with SMTP id q4mr49841281ljb.334.1638969292775; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 05:14:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211207201712.7yqbksbba3zgu7u3@linutronix.de> <20211207152049.1013e1ce@gandalf.local.home> <20211207205628.auc54rwl4duuisah@linutronix.de> <20211207160203.30206456@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20211207160203.30206456@gandalf.local.home> From: Luis Goncalves Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:14:41 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58 To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , LKML , linux-rt-users , stable-rt@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Carsten Emde , Daniel Wagner , Tom Zanussi , Clark Williams , Mark Gross , carnil@debian.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 6:02 PM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 21:56:28 +0100 > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > On 2021-12-07 15:20:49 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 21:17:12 +0100 > > > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > > > > > On 2021-12-02 19:05:53 [-0300], Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote: > > > > > I'm pleased to announce the 5.10.83-rt58 stable release. > > > > =E2=80=A6 > > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/patch-= 5.10.83-rt58.patch.xz > > > > > > > > Any particular reason why every patch has "v4.9-rt" in the Subject = line? > > > > > > I'm guessing because he just took over 5.10-rt and did not update his > > > scripts ;-) > > > > It seems to confuse ppl. Is there a reason to have it? > > > > It shouldn't. The point I'm making is that this is Luis's first release o= f > 5.10-rt, and it sounds like it had some issues. > > Luis, you may want to see what happened and fix it. Yes, I am really sorry that escaped my review. I focused on testing the code and missed something that obvious. Sorry for the confusion I caused. Steven, Sebastian, would it be worth a v5.10.83-rt59 with the patch subjects fixed? Thanks for spotting that, Luis > > Thanks, > > -- Steve >