From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932695AbbFRQWS (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:22:18 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:35649 "EHLO mail-wg0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756091AbbFRQWJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:22:09 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150618160915.GA16638@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1434582847-713-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> <20150617233040.GE7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150618085335.GF7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150618155545.GQ7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150618160915.GA16638@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:22:07 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: MuqWqOKCKwEYs3largaHeixPR0g Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: bridge/dw_hdmi: Filter modes > 165MHz for DVI From: Doug Anderson To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Philipp Zabel , Thierry Reding , Heiko Stuebner , David Airlie , Andy Yan , Yakir Yang , Fabio Estevam , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Russell, On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > So, what I'd like to see is a patch series which starts with the change > below, and builds on that, with explainations why each change is needed. > This is important, as this is shared IP, and we need to make sure that > we don't regress non-Rockchip users of this IP. I'll try and do some > work in this area if nothing crops up in the next month. OK. I've mostly been jumping in here to do a bugfix or two, not to take over maintenance of the driver. My general policy is to submit things upstream if at all possible, but I think in the case of HDMI we are just too different from upstream for this to be easy. I'll let you and Yakir figure out the way forward to keep everyone happy. If that means you submitting some patches then great. If that means Yakir submitting some patches then that's great too. In such a case you can consider my patch to be a bug report and I'll be happy with folks figure out the proper way to do this in the upstream driver. :) -Doug