All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Ravi Kumar Bokka (Temp)" <rbokka@codeaurora.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvmem: qfprom: minor nit fixes
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 08:22:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=W=dGfp2qvDNSg8keGSrGsOf_pEqjRzabrEyr8OdeBARA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1619416452-6852-1-git-send-email-rnayak@codeaurora.org>

Hi,

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 10:54 PM Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Fix a missed newline, change an 'if' to 'else if' and update
> a comment which is stale after the merge of '5a1bea2a: nvmem:
> qfprom: Add support for fuseblowing on sc7280'
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> v2: Added the change to move the 'if' to 'else if'
> Sending a follow-up patch for these nits since they came in after
> the previous patch was already pulled in
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1401964/
>
>  drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
> index d6d3f24..1ba666b 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static const struct qfprom_soc_compatible_data sc7280_qfprom = {
>         .keepout = sc7280_qfprom_keepout,
>         .nkeepout = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7280_qfprom_keepout)
>  };
> +
>  /**
>   * qfprom_disable_fuse_blowing() - Undo enabling of fuse blowing.
>   * @priv: Our driver data.
> @@ -195,7 +196,7 @@ static int qfprom_enable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv,
>         }
>
>         /*
> -        * Hardware requires 1.8V min for fuse blowing; this may be
> +        * Hardware requires a min voltage for fuse blowing; this may be
>          * a rail shared do don't specify a max--regulator constraints

Joe pointed out a typo in the original comment that "do" should be
"so" [1], but that's not new to your patch so:

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/73945e7037ab61eb34a2a1af05aa3eef75c8f836.camel@perches.com

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-26 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-26  5:54 [PATCH v2] nvmem: qfprom: minor nit fixes Rajendra Nayak
2021-04-26 15:22 ` Doug Anderson [this message]
2021-05-17  9:24 ` Srinivas Kandagatla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAD=FV=W=dGfp2qvDNSg8keGSrGsOf_pEqjRzabrEyr8OdeBARA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rbokka@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.