From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0A3C433F5 for ; Wed, 4 May 2022 18:22:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1376622AbiEDS0N (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2022 14:26:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43956 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1377164AbiEDSZe (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2022 14:25:34 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EC2053B59 for ; Wed, 4 May 2022 10:52:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id b24so2542801edu.10 for ; Wed, 04 May 2022 10:52:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=stNpZhjIc0rYI9UDa/dYUY+xIJVUaddvmdhdaTGP+Hg=; b=AAXDrANDKO1uGISazEbDjdomKwAoiXe4Gf0d06N7eRs7Mz6+HySMa2m59aygu7wY1K OshCn5wqPPIx2L71WNiK6uIY+jNs+wk69cCXgGJk9NdybD7+AevrQ/U4PB1f9WASix5r 4XbXskNBem/yi8dBdrlsUDvvTw9X1Dx6dC9Oo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=stNpZhjIc0rYI9UDa/dYUY+xIJVUaddvmdhdaTGP+Hg=; b=JqEXfI7FFKbrsATNM8vrywZo7d0XXjM0pXrC8BpJuXKFPEg9+E0+VpeNYWxrOY2NaG vRI9+SBVVRe1NCctDrAutg+koZ2cpHYvb8sk7mIrN7qUsQP9DWVl/Mtjy4E9i9pSUrmT 8m3UGzfgqQapch8CaPX5gUO8E1Rbb5058g82azP6iKHOzjIB39vEpttTFnkic8s6uzqR MeEbB0JEVHLZY7JAcTDkmg/kraBjuSsO/OCJ9mlrVCJUTrdj3ERLXu9AoCFEovGKQ0wH yCLNY56pYKscGLUzWqqyWGtyGLsXHAe6+vMyMAC6ySrRe5S3rS/2ipaXpR832ZgWeAA9 Ee4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530gl5xotJ4GLtn5O/Xim48WRIVdePWzu12JjDdQ3YA0Xr+nvgD5 3JdnRJCuD3JL0FesalegPX/cWF6DaDBNTTbgYDk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxsd5GU0g/PJlJBh6Z/khzOGabTyvnclnM7E3iWIU8OEYAcbLXA72oSVPZEDlKyZaOVnV5zgg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5c9:b0:420:aac6:257b with SMTP id n9-20020a05640205c900b00420aac6257bmr24393739edx.128.1651686718965; Wed, 04 May 2022 10:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wr1-f48.google.com (mail-wr1-f48.google.com. [209.85.221.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j12-20020aa7de8c000000b0042617ba63b2sm9411542edv.60.2022.05.04.10.51.58 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 May 2022 10:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-f48.google.com with SMTP id i5so3008304wrc.13 for ; Wed, 04 May 2022 10:51:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a5d:42c8:0:b0:20a:d91f:87b5 with SMTP id t8-20020a5d42c8000000b0020ad91f87b5mr17565732wrr.301.1651686717659; Wed, 04 May 2022 10:51:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220502173338.1.I26eca1856f99e6160d30de6d50ecab60e6226354@changeid> <165168485227.3730817.11549721304895378126.b4-ty@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <165168485227.3730817.11549721304895378126.b4-ty@linaro.org> From: Doug Anderson Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 10:51:44 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH] soc: qcom: socinfo: Add another ID for sc7180 To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: Sai Prakash Ranjan , matvore@chromium.org, Andy Gross , "Reviewed-by : Stephen Boyd" , LKML , linux-arm-msm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 10:21 AM Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Mon, 2 May 2022 17:33:45 -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote: > > It appears the some sc7180 devices, like the one in my > > sc7180-trogdor-homestar, report an ID of 407 instead of 425. Add > > another ID into the list. > > > > > > Applied, thanks! > > [1/1] soc: qcom: socinfo: Add another ID for sc7180 > commit: c35886d605604e0b03cdd835ae3249dc1fe0cc2a Hmm. Did you see the responses from Sai [1] about this? He seemed to indicate that there might be some issue here because he thought 407 was supposed to be a different SoC. Are we sure we want to land this patch while we're sorting it out? [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/13819b2d-26f0-14f4-9cb9-affb6b18f13d@quicinc.com/