Hi,

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 5:53 PM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Douglas,
>
> I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on pinctrl/devel]
> [also build test WARNING on v5.8-rc4 next-20200708]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use  as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Douglas-Anderson/pinctrl-qcom-Handle-broken-PDC-dual-edge-case-on-sc7180/20200709-051816
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git devel
> config: arm-defconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=arm
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c:914:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'msm_gpio_handle_dual_edge_parent_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>      914 | void msm_gpio_handle_dual_edge_parent_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
>          |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> vim +/msm_gpio_handle_dual_edge_parent_irq +914 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
>
>    913
>  > 914  void msm_gpio_handle_dual_edge_parent_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)

This is just because I'm missing a "static".

For now I'll hold-off on reposting and wait for additional feedback.
If I don't hear anything for a little while I'll re-post with this
fix.

-Doug