From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p8CB6Vib251191 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:06:32 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id A01C913DED8C for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 04:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Qsv5ggALgTOtBIpf for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 04:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fxh2 with SMTP id 2so1414150fxh.26 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 04:06:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20110910183028.GA23537@infradead.org> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:36:29 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: XFS: Observed Crash followed by deadlock of khubd/sync/XFS From: Amit Sahrawat List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Please ignore previous message, there is formatting issue with the back trace. I will post again. On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Amit Sahrawat wrote: > Yes, the patch is applied and the crash is still appearing easily. > > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:35:28PM +0530, Amit Sahrawat wrote: >>> Kernel Version: 2.6.39.4 >>> Target: ARM >>> >>> Observed while doing: >>> Copy some file (any size, I tried with 10MB, 100MB) to XFS partition >>> After Copy do???sync??? >>> Now immediately, unplug the device. >> >> Does this still happen with the patch below applied? >> >> > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs