From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub Subject: Re: 12.2.2 status Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 09:50:09 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87fua6c4xy.fsf@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com ([209.85.218.51]:51677 "EHLO mail-oi0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932127AbdJZQuK (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 12:50:10 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f51.google.com with SMTP id j126so6712115oib.8 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 09:50:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87fua6c4xy.fsf@suse.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Abhishek Lekshmanan Cc: ceph-devel , Sage Weil , Matt Benjamin , "Dillaman, Jason" , Patrick Donnelly , "Durgin, Josh" On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Abhishek Lekshmanan wrote: > > A first round of PRs were tested on Luminous integration branch, results > updated at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21830, > RADOS suite was green, RBD, RGW & FS hit some known failures > > ceph-disk has hit a failure with dmcrypt, details at > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21830#note-10 which doesn't seem to have > occured in QE runs before but there is a bug report, is anyone aware of > past issues with ceph-disk & dmcrypt? > > Also for the leads, Sage, Yehuda. Jason, Josh, Patrick are there any > critical PRs that we need to have in 12.2.2 so that we can include > them in the next round of testing before handing over to QE? > I'd be happy to see these fixed: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21819 http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21735 however, these are not in master yet, need validation. This one is ready I think: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21500 > Best, > Abhishek & Karol > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html