From: Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-cifs <linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Complete oplock break jobs before closing file handle
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 07:45:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADT32eLUO-sSio5PRZWB0kBvGB4QhYgy=LKOBKKOo8-Ww8nASg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421324524-2524-1-git-send-email-sprabhu-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Commit
> c11f1df5003d534fd067f0168bfad7befffb3b5c
> requires writers to wait for any pending oplock break handler to
> complete before proceeding to write. This is done by waiting on bit
> CIFS_INODE_PENDING_OPLOCK_BREAK in cifsFileInfo->flags. This bit is
> cleared by the oplock break handler job queued on the workqueue once it
> has completed handling the oplock break allowing writers to proceed with
> writing to the file.
>
> While testing, it was noticed that the filehandle could be closed while
> there is a pending oplock break which results in the oplock break
> handler on the cifsiod workqueue being cancelled before it has had a
> chance to execute and clear the CIFS_INODE_PENDING_OPLOCK_BREAK bit.
> Any subsequent attempt to write to this file hangs waiting for the
> CIFS_INODE_PENDING_OPLOCK_BREAK bit to be cleared.
>
> We fix this by ensuring that we also clear the bit
> CIFS_INODE_PENDING_OPLOCK_BREAK when we remove the oplock break handler
> from the workqueue.
>
> The bug was found by Red Hat QA while testing using ltp's fsstress
> command.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> fs/cifs/file.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
> index 96b7e9b..74f1287 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> @@ -366,6 +366,7 @@ void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> struct cifsLockInfo *li, *tmp;
> struct cifs_fid fid;
> struct cifs_pending_open open;
> + bool oplock_break_cancelled;
>
> spin_lock(&cifs_file_list_lock);
> if (--cifs_file->count > 0) {
> @@ -397,7 +398,7 @@ void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> }
> spin_unlock(&cifs_file_list_lock);
>
> - cancel_work_sync(&cifs_file->oplock_break);
> + oplock_break_cancelled = cancel_work_sync(&cifs_file->oplock_break);
>
> if (!tcon->need_reconnect && !cifs_file->invalidHandle) {
> struct TCP_Server_Info *server = tcon->ses->server;
> @@ -409,6 +410,9 @@ void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> _free_xid(xid);
> }
>
> + if (oplock_break_cancelled)
> + cifs_done_oplock_break(cifsi);
> +
> cifs_del_pending_open(&open);
>
> /*
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Does it matter what cancel_work_sync() returns?
Should cifs_done_oplock_break(cifsi); be called unconditionally?
Also, should this also to go stable?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-17 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-15 12:22 [PATCH] Complete oplock break jobs before closing file handle Sachin Prabhu
[not found] ` <1421324524-2524-1-git-send-email-sprabhu-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-17 13:45 ` Shirish Pargaonkar [this message]
[not found] ` <CADT32eLUO-sSio5PRZWB0kBvGB4QhYgy=LKOBKKOo8-Ww8nASg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-19 9:55 ` Sachin Prabhu
2015-01-19 12:02 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20150119070209.0f83b94d-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-19 16:24 ` Sachin Prabhu
[not found] ` <1421684692.13255.8.camel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-19 16:36 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20150119113656.5a47c742-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-19 17:13 ` Steve French
2015-01-19 22:15 ` Steve French
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADT32eLUO-sSio5PRZWB0kBvGB4QhYgy=LKOBKKOo8-Ww8nASg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=shirishpargaonkar-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sprabhu-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.