Hi Thierry,

2015-08-21 9:16 GMT-04:00 Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>:

> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 08:24:16PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > On 2015. 8. 21., at PM 7:01, Yakir Yang <ykk@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Jingoo,
> > >
> > >> 在 2015/8/21 16:20, Jingoo Han 写道:
> > >>> On 2015. 8. 19., at PM 11:48, Yakir Yang <ykk@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> .....
> > >>
> > >>> .../bindings/video/analogix_dp-rockchip.txt        |   83 ++
> > >>> .../devicetree/bindings/video/exynos_dp.txt        |   51 +-
> > >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts           |   10 +-
> > >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts          |   10 +-
> > >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts              |   12 +-
> > >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-spring.dts            |   12 +-
> > >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts         |   12 +-
> > >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts          |   10 +-
> > >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts          |   12 +-
> > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig                     |    5 +
> > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile                    |    1 +
> > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.c          | 1382
> +++++++++++++++++++
> > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.h          |  286 ++++
> > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_reg.c           | 1294
> ++++++++++++++++++
> > >>> .../exynos_dp_reg.h => bridge/analogix_dp_reg.h}   |  270 ++--
> > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/Kconfig                     |    5 +-
> > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/Makefile                    |    2 +-
> > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/analogix_dp-exynos.c        |  347 +++++
> > >> Would you change this file name to "exynos_dp.c"?
> > >
> > > Sorry, I don't think so  ;(
> > >
> > > I think IP_name+Soc_name would be better in this re-use case.
> >
> > So? Is there the naming rule such as "IP_name+SoC_name"?
> >
> > > Beside I see
> > > there are lots of driver named with this format in kernel, such as
> dw_hdmi & dw_mmc
> >
> > Please look at other dw cases.
> > For example, look at dw_pcie.
> >
> > drivers/pci/host/
> > pcie-designware.c
> > pci-spear13xx.c
> > pci-exynos.c
> >
> > In this case, pci-spear13xx.c and pci-exynos.c do not use
> "IP_name+SoC_name", even though these are dw IPs.
> >
> > Also, naming consistency is more important.
> > Now, Exynos DRM files are using "exynos_drm_" prefix.
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/
> > exynos_drm_buf.c
> > exynos_drm_core.c
> > ....
> >
> > However, "analogix_dp-exynos.c" looks very inconsistent.
> >
> > If there is no strict naming rule, please use "exynos_dp.c"
> > or "exynos_drm_dp.c".
>
> Exynos DRM maintainers get to pick their filenames, so Yakir, please
> rename as Jingoo suggested.
>
> Even if you didn't the first thing that would go into the Exynos DRM
> driver tree after this is merged is a rename patch anyway.
>
>
Okay, thanks for your remind ;)

- Yakir



> Thierry
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>
>