From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neal Cardwell Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: better retrans tracking for defer-accept Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:27:06 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1351238750-13611-1-git-send-email-subramanian.vijay@gmail.com> <1351339032.30380.222.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1351344725.30380.286.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1351347537.30380.315.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Julian Anastasov , David Miller , Vijay Subramanian , Netdev , Venkat Venkatsubra , Elliott Hughes , Yuchung Cheng To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:41107 "EHLO mail-ie0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758499Ab2J0S1H (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:27:07 -0400 Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id k13so5061120iea.19 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 11:27:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1351347537.30380.315.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet > @@ -2638,7 +2642,7 @@ static void get_openreq4(const struct sock *sk, const struct request_sock *req, ... > - req->retrans, > + req->num_retrans, ... > @@ -1866,7 +1869,7 @@ static void get_openreq6(struct seq_file *seq, ... > - req->retrans, > + req->num_timeout, ... There's a slight inconsistency in the changes to get_openreq4() and get_openreq6() - the first now uses num_retrans and the second now uses num_timeout. Otherwise LGTM. neal