Re: [PATCH 4/5] sched/rt: Consider deadline tasks in cpupri_find()

From: Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] sched/rt: Consider deadline tasks in cpupri_find()
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 23:21:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADcy93WTRp6L7voorN59EeB+-1ry9kUn4kv73pmqMoQ8KqvSpQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150127180438.445d8e76@gandalf.local.home>

Hi Steven,

On 28 January 2015 at 07:04, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:58:59 +0100
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
>
>> Not a bad idea, Cc'ed Steve who likes to look after the RT bits,
>> excessive quoting for him.
>
> Yep I do.
>
>
>> > index ade2958..48c9576 100644
>> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> > @@ -5652,6 +5652,8 @@ static int init_rootdomain(struct root_domain *rd)
>> >
>> >     if (cpupri_init(&rd->cpupri) != 0)
>> >             goto free_rto_mask;
>> > +
>> > +   rd->cpupri.cpudl = &rd->cpudl;
>>
>> This is disgusting though; it breaks the cpuri abstraction. Why not pass
>> in the mask in the one place you actually need it?
>
> Yeah, probably should change cpupri_init() to take the rd->cpudl as a
> parameter.

Ok, thanks for your advice.
I'll refine this patch and send it out separately soon.

Thanks,
Xunlei

>
> Rest looks good (ignoring Peter's other comment that he realized wasn't
> an issue).
>
> -- Steve
>