[U-Boot] [PATCHv2 1/6] reset: socfpga: add reset driver for SoCFPGA platform

[Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> On 04/05/2018 04:46 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/05/2018 09:12 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>> v
>>>
>>> On 04/04/2018 05:56 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> On 04/05/2018 12:18 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>>>> Add a DM compatible reset driver for the SoCFPGA platform.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>> +static int socfpga_reset_request(struct reset_ctl *reset_ctl)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +  debug("%s(reset_ctl=%p) (dev=%p, id=%lu)\n", __func__,
>>>>> +        reset_ctl, reset_ctl->dev, reset_ctl->id);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +  return 0;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static int socfpga_reset_free(struct reset_ctl *reset_ctl)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +  debug("%s(reset_ctl=%p) (dev=%p, id=%lu)\n", __func__, reset_ctl,
>>>>> +        reset_ctl->dev, reset_ctl->id);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +  return 0;
>>>>> +}
>>>>
>>>> Is request/free needed at all ? It looks like a useless debug to me.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I used the code to debug that the i2c driver did hook into the reset
>>> manager driver. Certainly, it can be removed in the final version. I'll
>>> send a V3 shortly with this removed.
>>>
>>
>> I cannot remove the request function as this is needed in the
>> reset-uclass driver.
>
> Fix the driver please.
>
>> Do you want me to remove free? Leaving the code
>> there seems harmless to me.
>
> Do a generic fix and then submit a fix for this driver, so two patches
> in total. I'll apply the V2 for now.
>

Ok...will do.

Dinh