Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] iio: adc: Add rtq6056 support

[ChiYuan Huang <u0084500@gmail.com>]

ChiYuan Huang <u0084500@gmail.com> 於 2022年7月11日 週一 上午10:48寫道：
>
> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> 於 2022年7月8日 週五 凌晨1:20寫道：
> >
> > On Wed,  6 Jul 2022 22:11:42 +0800
> > cy_huang <u0084500@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
> > >
> > > Add Richtek rtq6056 supporting.
> > >
> > > It can be used for the system to monitor load current and power with 16-bit
> > > resolution.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> >
> > Various feedback inline.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > > ---
> > > Since v5
> > > - Fix kernel version text for ABI.
> > >
> > > Since v4
> > > - Add '__aligned(8)' for timestamp member in buffer_trigger_handler function.
> > > - Declare timestamp from 'int64_t' to more unified 's64'.
> > >
> > > Since v3
> > > - Refine pm_runtime API calling order in 'read_channel' API.
> > > - Fix vshunt wrong scale for divider.
> > > - Refine the comment text.
> > > - Use 'devm_add_action_or_reset' to decrease the code usage in probe
> > >   function.
> > > - Use RUNTIME_PM_OPS to replace SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS.
> > > - minor fix for the comma.
> > > - Use pm_ptr to replace the direct assigned pm_ops.
> > >
> > > Since v2
> > > - Rename file from 'rtq6056-adc' to 'rtq6056'.
> > > - Refine the ABI, if generic already defined it, remove it and check the channel
> > >   report unit.
> > > - Add copyright text.
> > > - include the correct header.
> > > - change the property parsing name.
> > > - To use iio_chan_spec address field.
> > > - Refine each channel separate and shared_by_all.
> > > - Use pm_runtime and pm_runtime_autosuspend.
> > > - Remove the shutdown callback. From the HW suggestion, it's not recommended to
> > >   use battery as the power supply.
> > > - Check all scale unit (voltage->mV, current->mA, power->milliWatt).
> > > - Use the read_avail to provide the interface for attribute value list.
> > > - Add comma for the last element in the const integer array.
> > > - Refine each ADC label text.
> > > - In read_label callback, replace snprintf to sysfs_emit.
> > >
> > > ---
> > >  .../ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-adc-rtq6056          |   6 +
> > >  drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig                            |  15 +
> > >  drivers/iio/adc/Makefile                           |   1 +
> > >  drivers/iio/adc/rtq6056.c                          | 651 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  4 files changed, 673 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-adc-rtq6056
> > >  create mode 100644 drivers/iio/adc/rtq6056.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-adc-rtq6056 b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-adc-rtq6056
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000..e89d15b
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-adc-rtq6056
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> > > +What:                /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_voltage0_integration_time
> > > +What:                /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_voltage1_integration_time
> > > +KernelVersion:       5.20
> > > +Contact:     cy_huang@richtek.com
> > > +Description:
> > > +             Each voltage conversion time in uS
> >
> > Please move this entry to sysfs-bus-iio
> >
> > It's a natural extension of existing standard ABI so doesn't need to be in
> > a driver specific documentation file.
> >
> > However, way back in patch 1 I gave feedback on why we don't normally use integration time
> > for voltage channels and I thought you were changing this...
> >
> I didn't intend to change this. Just cannot find any suitable
> attribute for this feature.
> From the IC interrnal, there's only one set of ADC.
> And the conversion order is bus/shunt......, average sample count to
> control the sample update interval.
> That' why the sample frequency is calculated by one second to divide
> [(bus_ct + shunt_ct) *  average sample bit] (us)
>
> If it's not suitable for this attribute, I think it's better to change
> it as file attribute, not IIO channel attribute.
>
> How do you think?
> > ...
> >
> > > +static int rtq6056_adc_read_channel(struct rtq6056_priv *priv,
> > > +                                 struct iio_chan_spec const *ch,
> > > +                                 int *val)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> > > +     unsigned int addr = ch->address;
> > > +     unsigned int regval;
> > > +     int ret;
> > > +
> > > +     pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> > > +     ret = regmap_read(priv->regmap, addr, &regval);
> > > +     pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> > > +     pm_runtime_put(dev);
> > > +     if (ret)
> > > +             return ret;
> > > +
> > > +     /* Power and VBUS is unsigned 16-bit, others are signed 16-bit */
> > > +     if (addr == RTQ6056_REG_BUSVOLT || addr == RTQ6056_REG_POWER)
> > > +             *val = regval;
> > > +     else
> > > +             *val = sign_extend32(regval, 16);
> > > +
> >
> > One blank line only.
> >
> > > +
> > > +     return IIO_VAL_INT;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > ...
> >
> >
> > > +
> > > +static int rtq6056_adc_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > > +                              struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int val,
> > > +                              int val2, long mask)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct rtq6056_priv *priv = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > > +
> > > +     if (iio_buffer_enabled(indio_dev))
> >
> > This is racy as can enter buffered mode immediately after this check.
> > Use iio_device_claim_direct_mode() to avoid any races around this.
> >
> for the shunt resistor attribute write, also?
> > > +             return -EBUSY;
> > > +
> > > +     switch (mask) {
> > > +     case IIO_CHAN_INFO_INT_TIME:
> > > +             return rtq6056_adc_set_conv_time(priv, chan, val);
> > > +     case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO:
> > > +             return rtq6056_adc_set_average(priv, val);
> > > +     default:
> > > +             return -EINVAL;
> > > +     }
> > > +}
> >
> >
> > > +
> > > +static void rtq6056_remove(void *dev)
> > > +{
> > > +     pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(dev);
> > > +     pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> > > +     pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
> >
> > There isn't anything here to push the device into a suspend state, so why
> > does calling pm_runtime_set_suspended() make sense?
> >
> As I know, It is needed, at least 'pm_runtime_set_suspended' must be kept.
>
> To think one case, adc is reading, module is removing.
> Who  will change the IC state to off?
>
> pm_runtime is already disabled, the IC will be kept in 'active', right?
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >
> > > +
> > > +static int rtq6056_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> > > +     struct rtq6056_priv *priv;
> > > +     struct device *dev = &i2c->dev;
> > > +     struct regmap *regmap;
> > > +     unsigned int vendor_id, shunt_resistor_uohm;
> > > +     int ret;
> > > +
> > > +     if (!i2c_check_functionality(i2c->adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD_DATA))
> > > +             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +
> > > +     indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*priv));
> > > +     if (!indio_dev)
> > > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > +     priv = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > > +     priv->dev = dev;
> > > +     priv->vshuntct_us = priv->vbusct_us = 1037;
> > > +     priv->avg_sample = 1;
> > > +     i2c_set_clientdata(i2c, priv);
> > > +
> > > +     regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(i2c, &rtq6056_regmap_config);
> > > +     if (IS_ERR(regmap))
> > > +             return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(regmap),
> > > +                                  "Failed to init regmap\n");
> > > +
> > > +     priv->regmap = regmap;
> > > +
> > > +     ret = regmap_read(regmap, RTQ6056_REG_MANUFACTID, &vendor_id);
> > > +     if (ret)
> > > +             return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> > > +                                  "Failed to get manufacturer info\n");
> > > +
> > > +     if (vendor_id != RTQ6056_VENDOR_ID)
> > > +             return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV,
> > > +                                  "Invalid vendor id 0x%04x\n", vendor_id);
> > > +
> > > +     ret = devm_regmap_field_bulk_alloc(dev, regmap, priv->rm_fields,
> > > +                                        rtq6056_reg_fields, F_MAX_FIELDS);
> > > +     if (ret)
> > > +             return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to init regmap field\n");
> > > +
> > > +     /*
> > > +      * By default, configure average sample as 1, bus and shunt conversion
> > > +      * timea as 1037 microsecond, and operating mode to all on.
> > > +      */
> > > +     ret = regmap_write(regmap, RTQ6056_REG_CONFIG, RTQ6056_DEFAULT_CONFIG);
> > > +     if (ret)
> > > +             return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> > > +                                  "Failed to enable continuous sensing\n");
> > > +
> > > +     pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(dev, MSEC_PER_SEC);
> > > +     pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(dev);
> > > +     pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> > > +     pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> > > +     pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> >
> > Look at whether you can use devm_pm_runtime_enable()
> > Note it handles disabling autosuspend for you.
> >
> > When using runtime_pm() you want to ensure that the device works without
> > runtime pm support being enabled.  As such, you turn the device on before
> > enabling runtime_pm() and (this is missing I think) turn it off after disabling
> > runtime pm.  So I'd expect a devm_add_action_or_reset() call to unwind
> > setting the device into continuous sending above.
> >
> If so, I think it's better to configure the device keep in off state
> in probe stage.
> The calling order may need to be changed as below
> devm_add_action_or_reset...
>
> pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay
> pm_runtime_use_auto_suspend
> devm_pm_runtime_enable
>
Ah, not correct. How about if 'PM_RUNTIME' is not enabled?
Do we need to consider about this case?

If yes, the original flow about 'pm_runtime' is correct.
> > > +
> > > +     ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, rtq6056_remove, dev);
> >
> > The callback naming is too generic. It should give some indication
> > of what it is undoing (much of probe is handled by other devm_ callbacks).
> >
> How about to change the name to 'rtq6056_enter_shutdown_state'?
> And in this function, to change the device state in shutdown with
> 'pm_runtime_set_suspended' API.
> > > +     if (ret)
> > > +             return ret;
> > > +
> > > +     /* By default, use 2000 micro-ohm resistor */
> > > +     shunt_resistor_uohm = 2000;
> > > +     device_property_read_u32(dev, "shunt-resistor-micro-ohms",
> > > +                              &shunt_resistor_uohm);
> > > +
> > > +     ret = rtq6056_set_shunt_resistor(priv, shunt_resistor_uohm);
> > > +     if (ret)
> > > +             return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> > > +                                  "Failed to init shunt resistor\n");
> > > +
> > > +     indio_dev->name = "rtq6056";
> > > +     indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> > > +     indio_dev->channels = rtq6056_channels;
> > > +     indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(rtq6056_channels);
> > > +     indio_dev->info = &rtq6056_info;
> > > +
> > > +     ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(dev, indio_dev, NULL,
> > > +                                           rtq6056_buffer_trigger_handler,
> > > +                                           NULL);
> > > +     if (ret)
> > > +             return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> > > +                                  "Failed to allocate iio trigger buffer\n");
> > > +
> > > +     return devm_iio_device_register(dev, indio_dev);
> > > +}
> >
> > > +
> > > +static const struct dev_pm_ops rtq6056_pm_ops = {
> > > +     RUNTIME_PM_OPS(rtq6056_runtime_suspend, rtq6056_runtime_resume, NULL)
> >
> > Is there any reason we can't use these same ops to achieve at least some power
> > saving in suspend?  i.e. use DEFINE_RUNTIME_PM_OPS()
>                                                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>                                                  Where can I find this?
> >
> > I have tidying this up in existing drivers on my todo list as I think it is almost
> > always a good idea.  Note this is why there isn't a define to create the
> > particular combination you have here.
> >
> If there's no combination like as that one, why  not unify it  to
> '_DEFINE_DEV_PM_OPS'?
> > > +};
> > > +
> >