From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f65.google.com (mail-ej1-f65.google.com [209.85.218.65]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.11261.1600169727772877397 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 04:35:28 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Ca6W5rpi; spf=pass (domain: gmail.com, ip: 209.85.218.65, mailfrom: bruce.ashfield@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ej1-f65.google.com with SMTP id j11so4615978ejk.0 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 04:35:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+yYZIcM1FoCxwlZzVQUUM0inoomYnYnR6KNuiD0j1aE=; b=Ca6W5rpihj7NDzvu+vsi/aLAMAaZ3cISuH7tpTD3bdy0SB4H3PZPFIftizJAzNrJUY H2wMsp/Rc6Ft1sEvpRhOI6B24kLU2e8EHQMrtIQDg+9Jjcc/5pGRmMw7hRZnyukLJYgG v6ulb8rNsanGV+JNhCaPo7ghrN2s9LjWYER7Vi0IHGNUh1R7PHnbb/ikb8q3WiPh0+pm X7y4cu4elRwO4z4p+W61vJXvUEY3TOQW0do308ERfJ6QxfhVEY9cS5VxiOGFs49oIhNF t4l4kp5afmMOExYSdRDLE+NS2iL81TVvkFG7v63c1dBk78x/NBWCOXJaNUSZ+bONu6Fb PNew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+yYZIcM1FoCxwlZzVQUUM0inoomYnYnR6KNuiD0j1aE=; b=ELMU79fHVTCiH/Mh8M/a1Th3sQoy8Zyc9kaSvgIxH1vsOZaNtlXOUT1h7DWAK7cPdH 5rIkzqljdeTafU1ChiI+a9lJ6aqBJ8SgCCI+ams9asfRrRfPbOt2IRieq0I3uxD6ne5c 2G4qOX0gZf44alTigr5chqPlBERHCOXpLxe4Cz02fmz4Ov3DuuWka0Ph0xCtuwKZ+GUA LnoL5W4+jFMVVpBUqSIA3kI6SXr+JKpOMi63VHIsaFjvF9hJoPb84InHENEVD90RItVi laQ9T4knLPrdzMZ/2d/7NUBHeL7/C7RBkh54IZM3C8uDmsCj+bFm3xEzT4uj/IHNSHEl kGZg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531bm/NJgdHX39fEW0fN6Svac0HEGXSbYpSfAlzljzKkdERSgcfQ bGh+AeSsg1qyiInHP1cAvAy8KeLNhfQ7qlgSuVo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZO7Aokvosb41jaSFXLmFMR99quCrGGdtRMCidmls/Qf3R1RF1zUKHwWpug+OfHKkLNDF+vpcvTf76DGmgWVo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1e11:: with SMTP id g17mr18510928ejj.298.1600169726074; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 04:35:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <486E178E-DCB8-4B23-B199-63231267196E@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <486E178E-DCB8-4B23-B199-63231267196E@gmail.com> From: "Bruce Ashfield" Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:33:56 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 6/6] lttng-modules: backport patches from 2.12.x to fix 5.4.64+ and 5.8.9+ builds To: Jens Rehsack Cc: Richard Purdie , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:44 AM Jens Rehsack wrote: > > > > > Am 15.09.2020 um 00:34 schrieb Bruce Ashfield : > > > > From: Jens Rehsack > > > > Backporting the 10 patches since the lttng 2.12.2 release. We'll drop > > them once .3 is released, but for now, we need the fixes to build > > Yet another question: there is a stable-2.12 branch ... wouldn't it be reasonable to use this one as upstream source instead of the tarball? > We used to do that .. yes. But then the lttng recipe was changed away from git to using the tgz. I complained at the time (I'm sure it is in the archives for all to see), since I'm constantly doing new kernels and have to do this sort of exercise. The devupstream bbclass allows me to keep moving on my new kernels when I need to pick up changes for -dev, and luckily -stable doesn't normally need this sort of thing. IIRC it was switched to tgz since things like AUH work better with the tarballs, but I can't be sure. But let's just say that I agree that this recipe is better as a branch based, git recipe and not a tgz based recipe. I just haven't waded into the discussion to switch it back :) Bruce > > against the latest 5.4, 5.8 and 5.9 kernels. > > > > We also bump the devupstream SRCREV to pickup the same changes. > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > -- > Jens Rehsack - rehsack@gmail.com > -- - Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end - "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II