From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lj1-f195.google.com (mail-lj1-f195.google.com [209.85.208.195]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D802A79BA6 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 04:21:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f195.google.com with SMTP id q128so12935086ljb.11 for ; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 20:21:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=j+hu+k91s2Y0PEOL3G93nAGrFrjJY6he+4zZBh6rqUs=; b=MvDaJj86LK9DOiPfAfRrMT9Zrum31hySkwrLYUS5479yPpbj/NmkvdX9+48kYw2Zat /j/0MBrMegycPTeL3Tj/UQgyatYHYhxQmOJm8kATzYlxwohvcYTKT7qXK6FZqFIxKn/j QEikVh5DG6ZHrUUIqxNJtYGvXVZeplkVCKsiuy4p5W6ZyaqYhr/hvY50Pq8t10FXAtga /Gpe43KaWp9mkKckwYnvgKTSk6hBDaMpuQ+/GrHH2wiGCG4GcnV21rQ4B6ZnRPB/2lgE xsdnkpSsom01xa9Q6Zp2NFlg9F+yuXPSHQ+4ICRHo+N9yhDZF+5vFebXlOByDXiSsL1x ER4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=j+hu+k91s2Y0PEOL3G93nAGrFrjJY6he+4zZBh6rqUs=; b=lStYidLVF5LJUWPRvKQBwtM/4MLh0QT5FiFpPwMmPxSS5RYvUmbNSArXCfBsEldksl MWAfI4DE7WbJOkYuTxiBVL8J2+PuWfsMW3qLl5k1u8R5iOOCOTC2EaA0U/gNdXOP6IHv yACBpdk3GjNPg9rTpPGu4CoKxwlKkRDbG7e1KQpKfNot5KAtIHaZlOVSUEjPECuP6qOu tNbg8j8uYuaYKKYmc8B2Mol0hzjr5XltbjB7IdzqFTNcKy7ooXZGqrVcM86vNQio6zck BeXOg6kBAiH07Cae083gRJ8dIdsGRxUAYyX1/Ylpp5XhSQO4wqFV8Meb5p9b6MO5weka fmGg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWWguWe4iWPpJYkyfNKYvf9VJAMTI0dDBg6+TFkeB1+5l7OtrZn 1vfTiw0mWpPVT9v+rtU6cIdNUgypS14cwNlv8u8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxt4T65Ceok0yjcYe1hu0XBHrdM2rpMGO34m3beRxDPGagvO2vGAmAKUotubbcMxkOEL5Cu+tE8vLaZonSXVNg= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:6309:: with SMTP id x9mr4290257ljb.75.1551932502996; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 20:21:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <088fa1a03d1ff2ec9eb08d419e2a7c7bc1ee3406.camel@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <088fa1a03d1ff2ec9eb08d419e2a7c7bc1ee3406.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Bruce Ashfield Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 23:21:31 -0500 Message-ID: To: Richard Purdie Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request (5.0 kernel intro) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 04:21:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 6:05 PM Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 11:37 -0500, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote: > > The -rc8 of the kernel pushed this out a week longer than I would > > have liked, but luckily the -dev kernel has been running 5.0 for > > quite a while, so most of the issues had been worked out already. > > > > In this series we have the bump of the libc-headers to 5.0, I've > > built all arches for both musl and glibc, with no issues popping > > up due to the headers bump. A few patches were dropped, since they > > are now upstream. > > > > I've also introduce the 5.0 versioned recipe in this series and > > adjusted the two machines that still have a preferred version to > > use it. Again, this was built and booted on all arches and over > > several image types (minimal, sato, kernel-dev). > > > > As usual lttng was tweaked to work with 5.0, but I was able to > > keep it on the same 2.10 stable branch and only pull in a few > > pending patches that haven't been formally released yet. > > > > Once we get the h/w reference boards, and reference distros moved > > to 4.19 and 5.0, I'll send a follow up patch to remove 4.18 > > from master. > > > > I'll send follow up patches to the yocto-bsps and poky as > > appropriate, but until the last few issues are resolved, they can > > stay out of tree. > > > > I captured as many details as possible in the commit messages of > > the individual patches. > > Thanks Bruce! > > Just to summarise where we're at: > > a) The runtime stap tests fail everywhere, we probably need systemtap > patches. Fixes. Patches out shortly. > b) Issue with KMACHINE_qemuarm = "qemuarma15" not working, blocks > qemuarm armv7 switch I can have a look at this on Thursday. > c) qemumips and qemuppc: > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/60/builds/365/steps/7/logs/step1c > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/63/builds/365/steps/7/logs/step1c > RESULTS - kernelmodule.KernelModuleTest.test_kernel_module - Testcase 1541: FAILED Fixed, patches out shortly. > d) perf do_compile race seen on qemuarm64 (didn't reproduce locally): > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/42/builds/366/steps/7/logs/step1b I can't reproduce this one either. > e) qemuarm64 graphics startup issue > Not sure on this one. Bruce > Cheers, > > Richard > -- - Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end - "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II