From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SB8hJ-0001Lm-2a for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:54:45 +0100 Received: by wera1 with SMTP id a1so2854060wer.6 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:45:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JEign9/lOabw0wL6hyoKkC1SjbNAT3GXmjzQkmxqhcU=; b=Jc0+1emKVZvDbKpb3K6CL5ceSmpcnI7C0agAPoFS8ZSzw7U9CoiXhUWfHis6X07Trl yMewgonE8CnMQlqsoZnm3KgeeKkhHLsMt86Gi/jN0I7nxqRoJp8R/QM+7oezjJ5KnZEd jrI39z4d8YW1GlsQ5bU6yoFGg5rq6R5HQmNPYLwIC9LSPQyP/LZdLYoUCW46eZRzQ0S0 JXEI/vcSaDKyCyIVsHO055IjKZe/skLrgrJ6rywJIQd3T2AeEApgPpS3HQmLQwhKrD/W QzTVkkzDIoBiAREs6GRNAzbGMX1dUmlsAYW5D+/fsJ9nyAExkhg/rPCCedFWnvZKPBex 8+Pw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.102.129 with SMTP id fo1mr8331234wib.6.1332524748778; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:45:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.38.135 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:45:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:45:48 -0400 Message-ID: From: Bruce Ashfield To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Cc: saul.wold@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] linux-libc-headers: 3.2 and linux-libc-headers-yocto movement X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:54:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Koen Kooi wro= te: > > Op 23 mrt. 2012, om 18:07 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven: > >> Richard/Saul, >> >> As discussed on the mailing list here is a libc-headers series. I've kep= t it in >> three parts so you can pick what you want (except for the minor detail o= f >> needing to split patch 1/1 to keep 3.1 around if you don't want 2/3). >> >> I've built and booted this on all the emulated targets, and have some ot= her >> builds running against larger numbers of packages as well. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Bruce >> >> The following changes since commit bb1d7fad7ff8515939f2b5f0b540b9b09604b= e3c: >> =A0Richard Purdie (1): >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Revert "bitbake.conf/sstate.bbclass: Change PATH when ins= talling sstate files to avoid issues" >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> =A0git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib zedd/libc-headers-oe >> =A0http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=3Dzedd/libc-hea= ders-oe >> >> Bruce Ashfield (3): >> =A0linux-libc-headers: add 3.2 headers and remove 3.1 >> =A0linux-libc-headers: set default LINUXLIBCVERSION to 3.2 >> =A0linux-libc-headers-yocto: remove from oe-core > > Would it make more sense to move to 3.3 or is that too risky at this poin= t? I'm fine with the patchset either way, though. I thought about it as well, but since I've been building a booting 3.2 more often than 3.3, I took it easy with this change. But a 3.3/3.4 bump makes sense in the not too distant future, and obviously if there's consensus, I wouldn't argue strenuously against 3.3. Cheers, Bruce > > regards, > > Koen > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core --=20 "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end"