From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ed1-f67.google.com (mail-ed1-f67.google.com [209.85.208.67]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.5600.1588597602300670002 for ; Mon, 04 May 2020 06:06:42 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=oLsLpJDZ; spf=pass (domain: gmail.com, ip: 209.85.208.67, mailfrom: bruce.ashfield@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-f67.google.com with SMTP id s10so13419525edy.9 for ; Mon, 04 May 2020 06:06:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KOZzRPeWHFoZeAKjvOl/xNdAIMhmgDOHvKgF/RFSvBc=; b=oLsLpJDZBVNkfjEEmogpTFBZh4oAKzbykKr0AODv7KBefO3m4F/+RHKmKl7RfL7jCY FYm6ifgpUNEyuATWTezlw/GXD/1ljkZ3FY8s2tp+mD3O+x3+pH4YeIoa9heNkS12UAv7 F2UA5YA145BQ+2gxCp+SuthzkUqBDo8vCtD9ZukzEX1Choht+TnHMdRlM5LruZWprgp8 tqolt8TnxgmmN9Hh5nfQ51XYyL00pMljInSqM9gqzGuAKBaLzaE168MiWQavGW2c+3FN XOhF3GZDf2YQ2FuOpAz0FdUCkmAxtChy+EQ2oG9JtfmJDJzSQ6X6rUBgBYX4RRDNg5m5 4Ghg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KOZzRPeWHFoZeAKjvOl/xNdAIMhmgDOHvKgF/RFSvBc=; b=mToDsKWt9yQvzEcm8CQ2/gyYxtGoxo0UJ/9lcotMcRK7mZF+5iz99zaJ5/Ug/6+eJD E2Jmu2PMonrqsNJjqZMLLyvwCArz1X1HS6rM/xxT/YgxLU5KpAM8vXeyu/L9onagIBR2 suVq6ipPEswtxeYuySj5M978QQvSkoNr7X5QbGCm3B7jE3Xdh7WkJA8C8vT7daZc1J6+ H2Y+vB41FyR+l8rzI/ee1NsbRprZA4/IQxUHwucsio3EiYLGF0Ox3Vr56M2LnkkrLAZ0 ETFXEwcR8XAoXhpUg/Wi8bi7hb2rCz58pHlmsQRkgRIJPXB4X8YxOhvd+b1XdAEmWut0 gKvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZ/Ck0aycxN3WvTzGzCPifnoBGhTB81zTrbTOBL0R3GCul3cY0Y y0F52pJ0M18hp6SEi5h8oaxzC1zoKF0Dzwfdh2qAzJyf X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIaZTwt4Eu6QW0kfozqfTLwqeigUEHlpt9khgldziuFVTtd77p8mh0vTCROS5e1JK3scUZCUzTKNwQLvvkTdR0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1611:: with SMTP id f17mr13593231edv.352.1588597600494; Mon, 04 May 2020 06:06:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <70c6d988d291d1e2953d4b57cc9e88c146785d14.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <160BD489BF65999D.29536@lists.openembedded.org> In-Reply-To: <160BD489BF65999D.29536@lists.openembedded.org> From: "Bruce Ashfield" Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 09:06:29 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Cc: Richard Purdie , steve@sakoman.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 8:56 AM Bruce Ashfield via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 4:31 AM Richard Purdie > wrote: > > > > Hi Bruce, > > > > On Sun, 2020-05-03 at 11:44 -0400, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote: > > > From: Bruce Ashfield > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Here are the -stable updates I've collected since m3 of dunfell. I > > > ran things through the autobuilder, and no new kernel issues were > > > picked up. > > > > > > The -dev bump is good for master, while all of the 5.4-stable bumps > > > are good for both master and dunfell. > > > > I pulled these into master-next and saw reproducibility issues. I > > wondered why your test build didn't show it, turns out it also did: > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/56/builds/1024 > > > > 2020-05-04 05:18:46,863 - oe-selftest - INFO - =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > 2020-05-04 05:18:46,863 - oe-selftest - INFO - FAIL: reproducible.Repr= oducibleTests.test_reproducible_builds (subunit.RemotedTestCase) > > 2020-05-04 05:18:46,863 - oe-selftest - INFO - -----------------------= ----------------------------------------------- > > 2020-05-04 05:18:46,864 - oe-selftest - INFO - testtools.testresult.re= al._StringException: > > > > AssertionError: The following deb packages are missing or different: /= home/pokybuild/yocto-worker/oe-selftest-centos/build/build-st-36044/reprodu= cibleB/tmp/deploy/deb/./qemux86_64/kernel-module-kheaders-5.4.38-yocto-stan= dard_5.4.38+git0+f405543442_6cb5b11e83-r0_amd64.deb > > The following ipk packages are missing or different: /home/pokybuild/y= octo-worker/oe-selftest-centos/build/build-st-36044/reproducibleB/tmp/deplo= y/ipk/./qemux86_64/kernel-module-kheaders-5.4.38-yocto-standard_5.4.38+git0= +f405543442_6cb5b11e83-r0_qemux86_64.ipk > > > > I don't see any changes in the kernels that would have triggered it, > but they never are obvious. I am working on some kernel reproducibility changes that were discussed about three weeks ago. Is the default for reproducible builds in master-next different from what it was before dunfell was releases ? If so, that might explain why I'm not seeing a change that would have triggered it (i.e. this is unrelated to my -stable changes). Like I was mentioning before, if there's a document or pastebin of steps I can follow, I can run the tests against my pending changes and finish them for master. They of course would not necessarily be suitable for dunfell. Bruce > > I unfortunately have no idea how to run reproducibility tests on the > kernels locally and my build server at home is brutally underpowered > for more than one core-image build per arch a day (hence the > autobuilder runs). > > Is there a cut and paste se of instructions about the tests that I > could follow ? > > Bruce > > > master-next was: > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/80/builds/900 > > > > and friends. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Richard > > > > > -- > - Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await > thee at its end > - "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II >=20 --=20 - Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end - "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II