From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23B8C7618B for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CBD21738 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="OPVBip25" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728389AbfGXMgh (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 08:36:37 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f195.google.com ([209.85.160.195]:38959 "EHLO mail-qt1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726276AbfGXMgf (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 08:36:35 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f195.google.com with SMTP id l9so45239328qtu.6 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 05:36:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=voVat0+SUGB52qvYfXcNdUtGtc1hBZGuRMC7BUlflBk=; b=OPVBip25a2WbO9ODN0MyghyJIILAB6LukDE8UAmEorbY0N4kgLUY2uNRwi3FZ94Tq2 WVZJ27BVRqUFrwGrF7y3xRswPREKSy4ENkQABk4SMMM8MKReM5GAVLHzjRa+L0qk3ABJ oiMqnhzbp0/PJlMk5iRCEveK469FircUOR20RtoiHnlPymUhZmCBxeTDQcGdLBqY9U0C QCeLWleFpBFgm4lxQB3TLR9YLleAbu4NeFpgw94cGEwIqvbF0rK95tuKMkws8StrO+3/ e0PZIk2OoGm6E6dK1TYc1vNFRx6SDnVY4fMxm1fKkEHEmR58mbCgEU3QOT0f4JgMAuQ0 TzuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=voVat0+SUGB52qvYfXcNdUtGtc1hBZGuRMC7BUlflBk=; b=kZeJk4emNbHczedjMA1o5HFbCyPQWBOpm173uZEOUOueRfkmXBq65/ZRgIEIFpa0h1 j5wtAH0nytP61RA5ebmfveYGkM1PYCDuZKOyCenlR3Wsd3Bjim7e6UXsrsE2DXNIQvJg ZHXPGOaWlWTwi1dnCOc9PQaFFP2uGP8SF8pkygBRtTIMXhQRvv0dZz3YyYe9QG2HU6GP U4HgfHRdNET8JuzJxGvfJQR1lh47eI9WUL+t42+wqWnbpm3quA/9CrZefUVqCNA4oXBF dnyY3KK1KO5YQHoem4maookWJlzLaE4aAlYKsH1GccC/2Ex8h15ldc/InvsMU6gnDm/Y GGlA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV/LzYIkceGaw4nG8LTpPHwUxj3coOa9HobD4LHzPm8fXhTyCgJ NKCmy3bjQUZ3zZmhJl8hJPC0OQ8l6onbrapyzpY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqweMQQSqCE1gaCRnyucL3mpNVOzYSXi/vtTRECBlg3dbrAT8Icq4DwJgDvi+7/kFYQu2Om5YYbah/bQgvHXyQI= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:b159:: with SMTP id r25mr57272575qvc.219.1563971794304; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 05:36:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ad4:4144:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 05:36:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1556093512-5006-1-git-send-email-liush.damon@gmail.com> From: sh liu Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 20:36:33 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: redefine PTRS_PER_PGD/PTRS_PER_PMD/PTRS_PER_PTE To: Paul Walmsley Cc: palmer@sifive.com, sorear2@gmail.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, anup.patel@wdc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I think the previous description is unclear, and it is difficult for readers to understand the meaning of these macros, because I never understand. So I submitted this patch with reference to the definition of arm. I think this way can make the reader easier to understand, and I also think that this definition is more reasonable. 2019-06-29 2:52 GMT+08:00, Paul Walmsley : > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019, damon wrote: > >> Use the number of addresses to define the relevant macros. >> >> Signed-off-by: damon > > This patch looks reasonable to me. But what's missing from the > description is the motivation. Is this a prerequisite for another patch > that you're planning to post? Or because you think this is clearer than > the original? Or something else? etc. > > > - Paul > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E94C7618B for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F168E21738 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:36:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="iT4GXLmF"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="OPVBip25" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F168E21738 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Nd7cc9EPqA1SWS3eXFA0QvX1FunDdzccOihxCtjsQd8=; b=iT4GXLmFu1yTBn 2duvTfIrWMjIizjr/rUew570V9N2Wx/cb6EV5KR/1QSaE0F/yCJ8FRgBSEzfSCezcJpfo4fh9vkS1 Hx+AJJZgk1gVA4bZCMxYzdPWisurl+xKvkz9Ra+7cTcOP7ZMPkMvakB/nA+oHOZfea1cO4EAjfNwe DnRE3oPvDLzEWW/5QNKYNon3eCBKCLWU0xuQsswHgD2ZrUGSwkkXVAadP6Yz8/HPWnHD8+h8tZ4zK 6bQzYvpIhKqvUxqTXFWo6A1Mb10lCnWoNm/eLe062qwEt+4pjzH2yPid+Ne1qaPfssWN6cc9pe/b9 Qf2t2NvocbrBlGUvpmVg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hqGVb-00020S-GG; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:36:39 +0000 Received: from mail-qt1-x843.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::843]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hqGVX-0001xe-N6 for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:36:38 +0000 Received: by mail-qt1-x843.google.com with SMTP id y26so45266574qto.4 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 05:36:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=voVat0+SUGB52qvYfXcNdUtGtc1hBZGuRMC7BUlflBk=; b=OPVBip25a2WbO9ODN0MyghyJIILAB6LukDE8UAmEorbY0N4kgLUY2uNRwi3FZ94Tq2 WVZJ27BVRqUFrwGrF7y3xRswPREKSy4ENkQABk4SMMM8MKReM5GAVLHzjRa+L0qk3ABJ oiMqnhzbp0/PJlMk5iRCEveK469FircUOR20RtoiHnlPymUhZmCBxeTDQcGdLBqY9U0C QCeLWleFpBFgm4lxQB3TLR9YLleAbu4NeFpgw94cGEwIqvbF0rK95tuKMkws8StrO+3/ e0PZIk2OoGm6E6dK1TYc1vNFRx6SDnVY4fMxm1fKkEHEmR58mbCgEU3QOT0f4JgMAuQ0 TzuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=voVat0+SUGB52qvYfXcNdUtGtc1hBZGuRMC7BUlflBk=; b=GSTuel57aT4/AGuhQvL3qeo9by3xlAbBiQpNktj07/35Cxvvp7WqSa3hLku2x5teJn pJkVXbX4bshbJoAKjMHf880VUSdOTsmRUdRkLOkZ/9YKeqxkc6/dxmxUpuNTceDTjhJM ZPMxCJGsehDl4rV/Z1GsxDyB02uEFjy1nQHZ8Yh5CozDfHogYidcj/7xWGP7bbOy08DZ 2iHTZ81s3L9fSwQ0v3UOomQmQtcrGj3cUsemc+3xjO0yMB1pLgTUPPwhOr36+PuwIcUa ScjakHBnd+81wXhQF53AdNe81e7ATJFVqGesTiEKY3o/T8zEd7TCCh7d6Cisl4KwNAcN vjzg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW3MGZyhraG+ziZkOzMLWy5AsOo9kPn1UAx7Vp++W5jt4atTCaN c+SQ0d2pSfd9UtU9q41hFAJDmX3yOSbkb++Bnug= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqweMQQSqCE1gaCRnyucL3mpNVOzYSXi/vtTRECBlg3dbrAT8Icq4DwJgDvi+7/kFYQu2Om5YYbah/bQgvHXyQI= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:b159:: with SMTP id r25mr57272575qvc.219.1563971794304; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 05:36:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ad4:4144:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 05:36:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1556093512-5006-1-git-send-email-liush.damon@gmail.com> From: sh liu Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 20:36:33 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: redefine PTRS_PER_PGD/PTRS_PER_PMD/PTRS_PER_PTE To: Paul Walmsley X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190724_053635_753769_5610D2A1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.01 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: sorear2@gmail.com, palmer@sifive.com, anup.patel@wdc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org I think the previous description is unclear, and it is difficult for readers to understand the meaning of these macros, because I never understand. So I submitted this patch with reference to the definition of arm. I think this way can make the reader easier to understand, and I also think that this definition is more reasonable. 2019-06-29 2:52 GMT+08:00, Paul Walmsley : > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019, damon wrote: > >> Use the number of addresses to define the relevant macros. >> >> Signed-off-by: damon > > This patch looks reasonable to me. But what's missing from the > description is the motivation. Is this a prerequisite for another patch > that you're planning to post? Or because you think this is clearer than > the original? Or something else? etc. > > > - Paul > _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv