Re: [PATCH] drm: Document code of conduct

From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>,
	Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Document code of conduct
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:17:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADnq5_Pyr2g5LDshpYNs-a9u7_ctG31BMoZJk2GeWFipO9jX8w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uGKzW8Dq1HvH2NjZL6qfS-RizFk1abvQ+6bv=-OGD-LqQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 2:48 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>>> freedesktop.org has adopted a formal&enforced code of conduct:
>>>
>>> https://www.fooishbar.org/blog/fdo-contributor-covenant/
>>> https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/CodeOfConduct/
>>>
>>> Besides formalizing things a bit more I don't think this changes
>>> anything for us, we've already peer-enforced respectful and
>>> constructive interactions since a long time. But it's good to document
>>> things properly.
>>>
>>> Note: As Daniel Stone mentioned in the announcement fd.o admins
>>> started chatting with the communities their hosting, which includs the
>>
>> typos:
>> "they're" and "includes"
>>
>>> X.org foundation board, to figure out how to fan out enforcement and
>>> allow projects to run things on their own (with fd.o still as the
>>> fallback).  So the details of enforcement (and appealing decisions)
>>> might still change, but since this involves the board and lots more
>>> people it'll take a while to get there. For now this is good enough I
>>> think.
>>
>> Might want to clarify this paragraph.  This is a bit confusing for
>> those not following the discussions closely.  I think there is too
>> much mixing of projects and hosting and foundations and all three
>> should be distinct.  This patch proposes a CoC for the drm subsystem
>> of the kernel, not freedesktop, or Xorg or some other project and that
>> should be made clear.
>
> Yeah, looks like I mostly made a mess by trying to add a bit more
> context. I'd say this note here really should have been below the
> "---" to just make it part of the mail, not part of the commit
> message. I think I'll just drop it when applying, I think that'd be
> much better. Would also fix the typos in it :-)

With that fixed up:
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

> -Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel