From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id F141EE003C1; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:10:13 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.220.177 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [209.85.220.177 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] Received: from mail-qk0-f177.google.com (mail-qk0-f177.google.com [209.85.220.177]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177C9E0033D for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:10:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk0-f177.google.com with SMTP id a20so38730760qkc.1 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:10:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=boundarydevices-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZVrEdV7VQ2iaVCQyxcF1yj7RPHxt9itz6ZFiXnU72wM=; b=fWnP9JfkZSQMWzI+tMB+53NFr8AUKD4Tv7iguhrY7Gn7vgf5lxkG7uWhZ3p2jCL4UR YiyJcyV5i7+0Zjq46NfJboqTczGTY2ofaKyBNi8wNwCre7YTo3B3CpofoHYVc67Z+C4e 4WqlJfKOAaeAwM1uGIqKqVW+gpp1tBMaVAUUuWrVbHADWct27gTBKnD1ja2zLL/2D78C Za5HQbdWZsfdhBG7CJUEisqlOsCPiI53QDBs6n2Leh11Kx6Plzb3aZzcAKdIZqgQ1yuz +AozPC3wfrxULoesSK/tNCXbjIIpVt6miwkqQtmcU8vJhAY857jgySP/tU1oZNyn7uwc CsqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZVrEdV7VQ2iaVCQyxcF1yj7RPHxt9itz6ZFiXnU72wM=; b=BtpE6iqSdwW2IB8+1gmPw8tBQnH4FQDqjyn0dkjx0BB15zjLnraFUfoskpUgfRSkN8 GngIbDA3p2/yovbVQKbqTYWZobwyzWNEazOZDgPMjFu0asRR9HM2G38L3izduYyKYp+l 9UXPxreb9U6hBWS/kiZfQTTNRnksQ4QqaYVaiqzPPUXhievbei0ezAQzFbgJpDrw5pxi YLHYAi13pMWKUNGHBjW0Rv945DsSvLNEyfkn0KLNA7ob1udRDWyk2EGRzrJw2OatQOQU 8rLwzCu88fiBnsikmhUz0wJCELXQkIQOJsEUcnpQLKvA8o7vzFjr4k9XR2J9+LuiiSXV kQmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXK1iG5E4A9CTuXLTPc4bTtNfab9xgkuI1gQ7lYb4oaOTq+7TPuAWfXGI3RuZ//KqupHohL0jRVB5INmJg== X-Received: by 10.55.75.134 with SMTP id y128mr15083026qka.134.1484266210895; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:10:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.200.44.155 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:10:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <66e9b60c-d9ea-47c3-d317-7897e08d8ff8@mlbassoc.com> References: <66e9b60c-d9ea-47c3-d317-7897e08d8ff8@mlbassoc.com> From: Ian Coolidge Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:10:10 -0800 Message-ID: To: Gary Thomas Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List Subject: Re: [boundary-imx] Enquiry boundary-imx_4.1.15_1.0.0_ga kernel with egalax touch support on sabrelite X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:10:14 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114a7a1e40c5080545eea8d1 --001a114a7a1e40c5080545eea8d1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 This should be fixed in the latest kernel. Waiting on patch to be accepted to update our morty blog post and images. You can update your builds independently to the latest revision here to see the fix: https://github.com/boundarydevices/linux-imx6/commits/boundary-imx_4.1.15_2.0.0_ga On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 5:14 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2017-01-12 14:09, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Shrikant Bobade >> wrote: >> >>> I used boundary-eval-image-nitrogen6x-krogoth-next.sdcard.gz >>> https://boundarydevices.com/krogoth-next-yocto-release/ on >>> imx6q-sabrelite >>> target along with 10Inch Hannstar LVDS Display connected. >>> >>> Observed the egalax touch is not working out of box. Does anyone else >>> faced >>> similar issue? >>> Is Hannstar LVDS display supported by default? >>> >> >> Do you mind to test with other test images? >> >> http://blink.ossystems.com.br/manufacturer/boundary >> >> Those uses new kernel and provides new boot scripts. It may provide a >> better result. Make sure to also use the latest production release for >> U-Boot provided by them. >> >> > Note that Ian (Boundary Devices) just sent some patches for what > seems to be this problem. It may be easier to just check against > those. > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Gary Thomas | Consulting for the > MLB Associates | Embedded world > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > _______________________________________________ > meta-freescale mailing list > meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale > --001a114a7a1e40c5080545eea8d1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This should be fixed in the latest kernel. Waiting on patc= h to be accepted to update our morty blog post and images.

You can update your builds independently to the latest revision here to = see the fix:=C2=A0https://github.com/boundarydevices/li= nux-imx6/commits/boundary-imx_4.1.15_2.0.0_ga

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 5:14 AM= , Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote:
On 2017-01-12 14:09, Otavio Salvador wrote:=
Hello,

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Shrikant Bobade
<bobadeshr= ikant@gmail.com> wrote:
I used boundary-eval-image-nitrogen6x-krogoth-next.sdcard.gz
https://boundarydevices.com/krogoth-next= -yocto-release/ on imx6q-sabrelite
target along with 10Inch Hannstar LVDS Display connected.

Observed the egalax touch is not working out of box. Does anyone else faced=
similar issue?
Is Hannstar LVDS display supported by default?

Do you mind to test with other test images?

http://blink.ossystems.com.br/manufacturer/b= oundary

Those uses new kernel and provides new boot scripts. It may provide a
better result. Make sure to also use the latest production release for
U-Boot provided by them.


 Note that Ian (Boundary Devices) just sent some patches for what
seems to be this problem.=C2=A0 It may be easier to just check against
those.

--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0|= =C2=A0 Consulting for the
MLB Associates=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 |=C2=A0 =C2= =A0 Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------

--
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
meta-f= reescale@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/m= eta-freescale

--001a114a7a1e40c5080545eea8d1--