From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paarvai Naai Subject: Re: Fwd: Querying current tx_queue usage of a SocketCAN interface Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 10:54:36 -0700 Message-ID: References: <55187FF1.7020701@optusnet.com.au> <5519E5A9.7080104@optusnet.com.au> <551A0FF3.4070400@optusnet.com.au> <551C7D79.50906@optusnet.com.au> <551CE5C9.6020600@pengutronix.de> <551DEE7C.6040202@optusnet.com.au> <1f3de4fb-6a20-48aa-9b6b-102ef079e299@email.android.com> <7573caff-e3ce-4927-a12b-11d98b8cb333@email.android.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com ([209.85.214.177]:32846 "EHLO mail-ob0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750891AbbDFRyh (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Apr 2015 13:54:37 -0400 Received: by oblw8 with SMTP id w8so1751473obl.0 for ; Mon, 06 Apr 2015 10:54:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Marc Kleine-Budde Cc: Tom Evans , Dan Egnor , linux-can@vger.kernel.org Yup, that was a typo. Sorry for any confusion! On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > > > On April 3, 2015 9:53:17 PM GMT+01:00, Paarvai Naai wrote: >>Hi Marc, >> >>> Just glancing at libsocketcan, I don't see an option to set the tx >>queue len. The parameter is not CAN specific. >> >>You are right, of course. My confusion stemmed from the fact that >>someone else here pulled down libsocketcan and then modified it to add >>this as an API call to libsocketcan.{h,cc}. Thanks for setting me >>straight. I will look into this further. > > Btw, libsocketcan is not C++ as a your .cc file extension might suggest. > > Marc