From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29865C433E0 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 10:22:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0618A206A5 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 10:22:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="SL8beS89" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726374AbgENKWc (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2020 06:22:32 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:53303 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726010AbgENKW2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2020 06:22:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1589451739; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xdmT6ANXa6NhFjFuIFGimW7zROVm3IZ6tXffgmcMrRw=; b=SL8beS89VTXY/2Xo7ZWoHcFNI73lURdiwbE3U76+SNedpqT4dMSCJjSPlJh+pB7rpJ8Dem OBaDNlqK/uTAmFUinCMSuBnPJJQFXvfYkTBAsXGhdYw1jZ97ZQsbRjVTr7Rdfv0Hk2GY3f Quk1fBn7l24j9PpXjpA2ALRNNnXEpWs= Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-220-M-I0_sIFPf20W1D5ymTfcw-1; Thu, 14 May 2020 06:22:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: M-I0_sIFPf20W1D5ymTfcw-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id b7so959209edf.9 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 03:22:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xdmT6ANXa6NhFjFuIFGimW7zROVm3IZ6tXffgmcMrRw=; b=qHZ9L/tyfneXaFWC+pCeMCY92uk3bOSenw8fQN4Rik1YQHDSV2ZjnvnPKZu6RMn2g1 YUDwxBP8DHUiG+JfawxKQA1ApKehCVnr191OJXD46RUWg6ga3IIVzeo32cKvTinHxWu8 N4OMLXT5GIFs0K3Inl80dhthpQBwov0ke91a/YggaKeGSgAZP2hbZQHiDbfq1bv01zuq Cuc4Z76NY6peg3fsndPgfrA7UmyU1NuXByjrzlZACFrK6nM1egNeuW6+Vs2OqrofCE4X jvTQ5QVH9hzVv+rXv5Uqy9CgRdjn4FsITuLZUnCV4wK2DHTx+rMi2p3cI9eLb/L+5H16 COoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532HrstG7TGleI7PWZMwjWF/8KE+nrBnxXJVClYYLOF6CEZ3TcnU zPXNCyV86s7IFOX5xoo99WbL8nOgOMn0g1lcorWSoB14xILbgafd8bREj4fQMfqMA7C+lRFA1UQ t0vaTmpnhBDyDf8hlwZi4H3eNn9TR/oZxtqLHlnFq X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:cd08:: with SMTP id oz8mr951006ejb.90.1589451736312; Thu, 14 May 2020 03:22:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLm16DHWkAOyXk9ppPSD0F3lVHAw8cm/ZP5ATce5P9UjOR7zkbX73wgtYMc/2xXQCeE71RiQJSDs0cLAvzLaM= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:cd08:: with SMTP id oz8mr950983ejb.90.1589451736069; Thu, 14 May 2020 03:22:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200507155422.GD3758@techsingularity.net> <20200508092212.GE3758@techsingularity.net> <20200513153023.GF3758@techsingularity.net> <20200514095055.GG3758@techsingularity.net> <20200514100814.GH3758@techsingularity.net> In-Reply-To: <20200514100814.GH3758@techsingularity.net> From: Jirka Hladky Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 12:22:05 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Reconcile NUMA balancing decisions with the load balancer v6 To: Mel Gorman Cc: Phil Auld , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Vincent Guittot , Juri Lelli , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Valentin Schneider , Hillf Danton , LKML , Douglas Shakshober , Waiman Long , Joe Mario , Bill Gray Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thanks! Do you have a link? I cannot find it on github (https://github.com/gormanm/mmtests, searched for config-network-netperf-cstate-small-cross-socket) On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:08 PM Mel Gorman wrote: > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:58:36AM +0200, Jirka Hladky wrote: > > Thank you, Mel! > > > > We are using netperf as well, but AFAIK it's running on two different > > hosts. I will check with colleagues, if they can > > add network-netperf-unbound run on the localhost. > > > > Is this the right config? > > https://github.com/gormanm/mmtests/blob/345f82bee77cbf09ba57f470a1cfc1ae413c97df/bin/generate-generic-configs > > sed -e 's/NETPERF_BUFFER_SIZES=.*/NETPERF_BUFFER_SIZES=64/' > > config-network-netperf-unbound > config-network-netperf-unbound-small > > > > That's one I was using at the moment to have a quick test after > the reconciliation series was completed. It has since changed to > config-network-netperf-cstate-small-cross-socket to limit cstates, bind > the client and server to two local CPUs and using one buffer size. It > was necessary to get an ftrace function graph of the wakeup path that > was readable and not too noisy due to migrations, cpuidle exit costs etc. > > -- > Mel Gorman > SUSE Labs > -- -Jirka