From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 4216EE00961; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:59:14 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.212.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (mail-wi0-f171.google.com [209.85.212.171]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F10BE00942 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:59:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id bs8so11752336wib.4 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:59:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XleInIm7dQL+0HHpm3JutoZO0kswg02lPq7GJ57up48=; b=N5YvJx7f9fK+NCApVbk0q8aFr9KN7rl9byIbP1ncFNsWVKfX+frmtIhJGynf1o19tM /fyAXPZlKRGPCuIcbr2Sr9HIROnpc9BhZgoraj3a4ZFZdy1F4opEG0960RnOzCWGScKZ VFhm9FVCl1uI9u9DL9lDVHIcd6Eob8Hg8bNB+1b+Efw2uT+jKR+4uE0xW4v/AKihIDp6 ieRU6c5zXde+t3Am2qHEkhPtBEhkjsjCKY0HHj52GwB14sAAUE79jfxgo0XcyHC30Y7h WhmINUuY5l2H85Dw9xKIy56mzc+ueTwuH60xZhmmuI+GjbFHHHZoS/VnfD70gRxoM9L3 yIKQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.110.161 with SMTP id ib1mr48297997wjb.78.1416992349842; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:59:09 -0800 (PST) Sender: stunpix@gmail.com Received: by 10.27.90.21 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:59:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54750168.3020007@pseudoterminal.org> References: <5475011B.4030706@pseudoterminal.org> <54750168.3020007@pseudoterminal.org> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:59:09 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dAqc5OaI9TVF-198gzXuTOkO50c Message-ID: From: Alexander Shashkevych To: Carlos Rafael Giani Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-demos][PATCH v2] packagegroup-fslc-gstreamer1.0-commercial: remove commercial recipe X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:59:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Sorry, typo. I meant "gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-asf" , not > "gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-asfdemux". The -asf package contains the > libgstasf.so plugin, which in turn contains the asfdemux element. This explains why I hadn't found ugly-asfdemux plugin when I did grep on recipes. > On 2014-11-25 23:22, Carlos Rafael Giani wrote: >> >> Hm, I am not sure how this came to be. Anyway, you are correct that mpg123 >> is not part of -ugly, so this entry should be removed. >> However, there is a "gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-asfdemux" package from >> -ugly, which does belong here. Also, I think perhaps we could >> move this line from the -full to the -commercial packagegroup: >> >> ${@base_contains('LICENSE_FLAGS_WHITELIST', 'commercial', >> 'gstreamer1.0-libav', '', d)} For me it looks ok. I'll prepare another patch. -- Regards, Alexander