From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dallas Clement Subject: Re: best base / worst case RAID 5,6 write speeds Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:55:09 -0600 Message-ID: References: <22122.64143.522908.45940@quad.stoffel.home> <22123.9525.433754.283927@quad.stoffel.home> <566B6C8F.7020201@turmel.org> <566BA6E5.6030008@turmel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Knecht Cc: Phil Turmel , John Stoffel , Linux-RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Dallas Clement > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Phil, I ran blktrace while writing with dd to a RAID 5 device with >> 12 disks. My chunk size is 128K. So I set my block size to 128K * >> (12-2) = 1280k. Here is the dd command I ran. > > Just curious but for my own knowledge if it's RAID5 why is it 12-2? > > - Mark > Just curious but for my own knowledge if it's RAID5 why is it 12-2? Shouldn't be. It should have been 12-1 or writing 1408k. Boy do I feel dumb. Anyhow, when writing this value, no more RMWs. Yay!