From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171]:41517 "EHLO mail-ie0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750919Ab3FDWIK (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2013 18:08:10 -0400 Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id s9so1775915iec.30 for ; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 15:08:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1369974092-11450-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com> <1369974092-11450-2-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 15:08:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI, ACPI: Don't glue ACPI dev with pci VFs From: Yinghai Lu To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Jiang Liu , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Xudong Hao , Yijing Wang , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Jiang Liu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > Well, I read that in the changelog, but that doesn't tell me what bad > things happen as a result. Can you elaborate a little bit? Does it > mean PM doesn't work, hotplug doesn't work, drivers can't bind to the > VFs correctly, the magic smoke comes out of the PF, or what? no, I did not notice anything unusual except the binding message. as my platform have those PM disabled.