From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] ACPI, PCI: add acpi_pci_roots protection Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:17:04 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20120903165831.29aed72c.izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> <20120903170602.375b00cc.izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:39344 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751313Ab2IMVRH (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:17:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Taku Izumi , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com, jiang.liu@huawei.com On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > If I understand you correctly, you're agreeing that if we change the > .add()/.remove() interfaces, there is no need for RCU here. Correct > me if I'm wrong. yes. just passing acpi_pci_root point or acpi_device pointer. Yinghai