On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:22:14PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
>> > Hello, Yinghai.
>> >
>> > Sorry about the delay.  I'm in bug storm somehow. :(
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 07:14:43PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
>> >> > I wish we had a single call - say, memblock_die(), or whatever - so
>> >> > that there's a clear indication that memblock usage is done, but yeah
>> >> > maybe another day.  Will review the patch itself.  BTW, can't you post
>> >> > patches inline anymore?  Attaching is better than corrupt but is still
>> >> > a bit annoying for review.
>> >>
>> >> please check the three patches:
>> >
>> > Heh, reviewing is cumbersome this way but here are my comments.
>> >
>> > * "[PATCH] memblock: free allocated memblock_reserved_regions later"
>> >  looks okay to me.
>>
>> Good, this one should go to 3.5, right?
>
> Yes, I think so.
>

Andrew,

can you push attached to Linus ?
or we need to route it through tip?

Thanks

Yinghai