From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:53711 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751197Ab2JREot (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:44:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121018042916.GP2739@dastard> References: <1349863655-29320-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com> <20121015204217.GB2739@dastard> <20121018042916.GP2739@dastard> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:44:47 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v3 00/13] vfs: hot data tracking From: Zhi Yong Wu To: Dave Chinner Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxram@linux.vnet.ibm.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, dave@jikos.cz, tytso@mit.edu, cmm@us.ibm.com, Zhi Yong Wu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 04:57:14PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 06:07:22PM +0800, zwu.kernel@gmail.com wrote: >> >> From: Zhi Yong Wu > .... >> > (*) Tested on an empty 17TB XFS filesystem with: >> > >> > $ sudo mkfs.xfs -f -l size=131072b,sunit=8 /dev/vdc >> > meta-data=/dev/vdc isize=256 agcount=17, agsize=268435455 blks >> > = sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=0 >> > data = bsize=4096 blocks=4563402735, imaxpct=5 >> > = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks >> > naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0 >> > log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=131072, version=2 >> > = sectsz=512 sunit=1 blks, lazy-count=1 >> > realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0 >> > $ sudo mount -o logbsize=256k /dev/vdc /mnt/scratch >> > $ sudo chmod 777 /mnt/scratch >> > $ fs_mark -D 10000 -S0 -n 100000 -s 1 -L 63 -d \ >> > /mnt/scratch/0 -d /mnt/scratch/1 -d /mnt/scratch/2 -d \ >> > /mnt/scratch/3 -d /mnt/scratch/4 -d /mnt/scratch/5 -d \ >> > /mnt/scratch/6 -d /mnt/scratch/7 >> > ..... >> > 0 21600000 1 16679.3 12552262 >> > 0 22400000 1 15412.4 12588587 >> > 0 23200000 1 16367.6 14199322 >> > 0 24000000 1 15680.4 15741205 >> > >> ^^^^In this test, i haven't see you enable hot_track function via >> mount, why did it meet OOM? > > I copied the wrong mount command. It was definitely enabled. OK, BTW: fs_mark is the script written by you? After xfsprogs is installed, i haven't found this command. > > Cheers, > > Dave. > > -- > Dave Chinner > david@fromorbit.com -- Regards, Zhi Yong Wu