From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id E6C3FE00B77; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 07:17:40 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (max.oss.09[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.208.182 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid Received: from mail-lj1-f182.google.com (mail-lj1-f182.google.com [209.85.208.182]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F16E009AA for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 07:17:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-f182.google.com with SMTP id v15-v6so6772935ljh.13 for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 07:17:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=c5yRU5dulGzwOqPYZAU7oYrHULqUa5CZ+vcq8OW2RWw=; b=RM2t/ukm+IlTXAg0tT/UoH2IoxBsKtI8OG8FsFqts3WaGMApaCy6AYZjGXJ0Tx4n8/ 2eH5sIhNVHPstV8cgwJBcs95BtAJ7dxMia6UlsQAcqXpjw5nLD5UGzqe15yLQY6OzoV8 Na+ICD6ZrANaC0BcREcBsm0UmYrkBBzI2cbw9CJ/DCBcjZfD1O6hcuVXDs36ERWSQT/E H+95y29oVPJi7ws/iMkcSwEnAzRWseAxkFqFnrF+ocXL66sKtb/0nOfk3hawHAgK3E4K gSg7hfGdz9zXT/gxpLpKfrupZvEu4m+L4mqa1DVdgYDMWJuXo38u/c99eSI5HPbEXN3r kp9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=c5yRU5dulGzwOqPYZAU7oYrHULqUa5CZ+vcq8OW2RWw=; b=NpSeTDxuT4h4MqPKBT1d9EL8RcYAkH+2meFC5Dkal5FvHIpGOIeJWvKdx3bziWDJVc ovRn7BVFU8Hk5it/Gqdf8UHIdiJ4hlMewRosEQViY5YyFJj4NX+0T1T2L587x47l8Ozb JpJXpdccc/usWtnTcGHc1nfVSwvNGCD4UJEtcKhb+PnAdLU2TbCJG9/uz/e2K1+vV8nw MfeoHs90qvx/VFTZzezivItxkWNLv7YJb5PbMftJMI9ZzSznrYDVz/gifsWAHn1ClO7n CWX6Pwsgs585LCnc2ytQXyi1TtZmuQ8LoWKHgScuiPwU4NrEoQ8wR/wTfJvr1jfEYBoF vaEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukePrUJr1z68gk9aYrFNE5+Ys71ffQ+fbudQmHQOxFp32RqJYomJ E9CfL68T5lR19/T9PF++unvCa/Dj8dieZIksY2I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6SVEwZ5vCThIg/vHw7ajMdwFrafy/gCXA2qTCvsZfs8u876UtngT8TSTmLcFNdqjJeUtiBsyRFpb7bCJlmyhs= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8643:: with SMTP id i3-v6mr3252495ljj.43.1547047059093; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 07:17:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Max Krummenacher Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 16:17:28 +0100 Message-ID: To: Vincent Prince Cc: meta-freescale Subject: Re: Status of i.MX8 support X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 15:17:41 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000687b70057f07f652" --000000000000687b70057f07f652 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi > What is the state of the meta-freescale i.MX8 support? I'm trying to > compile image for NXP i.MX8 development board (MCIMX8QXP - CPU). Please have a look at this patchset: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2019-January/023633.html Note that I used master but that should not make a difference. This likely makes your build go further. I guess you will then also be stuck at the image wic build step, however you would get kernel/dtb/rootfs (Which I did not have to time to test on a board) Regards, Max --000000000000687b70057f07f652 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi

> What is the state of the meta-freescale i.MX8 support? I'= m trying to
> compile image for NXP i.MX8 development board (MCIMX8QXP - CPU).
=

Please have a look at this patchset:

Note that I used master but t= hat should not make a difference.

This likely make= s your build go further.
I guess you will then also be stuck at t= he image wic build step, however you would get kernel/dtb/rootfs (Which I d= id not have to time to test on a board)

Regards,
Max


--000000000000687b70057f07f652--