From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cloverobert@gmail.com (Robert Clove) Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 07:28:24 -0700 Subject: Fwd: Packet Loss In-Reply-To: References: <20131028105151.GI77546@vega.codepro.be> <20131028121424.GK77546@vega.codepro.be> Message-ID: To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Kristof Provost wrote: > On 2013-10-28 17:32:43 (+0530), Robert Clove > wrote: > > Kind of Packets :- *UDP* > > How are you generating them? :-* Packeth ( > > http://packeth.sourceforge.net/packeth/Home.html)* > > kernel version : uname -r - *2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.x86_64 > > * > > Are you *SURE* you're sending 1000? - *ya checked through packeth status > > bar and also through ifconfig command* > > I have connected them through LAN cable (cat 6) back to back. > > > > Changed cable but no use. > > What should i do? > > > Break down the problem. Get that smart switch to tell you if the packets > are lost by the sender of the receiver. > > Test if it's bidirectional (i.e. does it still happen if the switch the > sender and receiver)? > > Does it still happen if you send only 100 packets? Do you still lose 30% > then, or do you lose more or less? > > Perhaps try a kernel that isn't nearly five years old too. > > Also, don't top-post. > > Regards, > Kristof > > Hey Sir, I just want to know are there any driver or kernel parameters that we can adjust to get the better packet capture? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20131102/08d14366/attachment.html