From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexander Afonyashin <a.afonyashin@madnet-team.ru>
Subject: Re: best base / worst case RAID 5,6 write speeds
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:36:28 +0300
Message-ID: <CAETWcfs_UmRKi+x3Wf+z2aaG6+x-qyCgBHk+OUdjE7r0XpCYEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE9DZUR=uSzYfdqFkVFdyXx+iKb1SeXxo5eX7M_nTw-fnWBwNA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAE9DZUR=uSzYfdqFkVFdyXx+iKb1SeXxo5eX7M_nTw-fnWBwNA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Dallas Clement <dallas.a.clement@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux-RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Hi,

Did you set stride/stripe configuration to filesystem that is aligned
with raid configuration?

Regards,
Alexander

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Dallas Clement
<dallas.a.clement@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all.  I'm trying to determine best and worst case expected
> sequential write speeds for Linux software RAID with spinning disks.
>
> I have been assuming on the following:
>
> Best case RAID 6 sequential write speed is (N-2) * X, where is is
> number of drives and X is write speed of a single drive.
>
> Worst case RAID 6 sequential write speed is (N-2) * X / 2.
>
> Best case RAID 5 sequential write speed is (N-1) * X.
>
> Worst case RAID 5 sequential write speed is (N-1) * X / 2.
>
> Could someone please confirm whether these formulas are accurate or not?
>
>
> I am not even getting worst case write performance with an array of 12
> spinning 7200 RPM SATA disks.  Thus I  suspect either the formulas I
> am using are wrong or I have alignment issues or something.  My chunk
> size is 128 KB at the moment.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dallas
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html