From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:21:00 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] fu540: prci: add request and free clock handlers
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR13MB2614A807E5EE4FC44D471E8399950@BYAPR13MB2614.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
References: <1592745008-17196-1-git-send-email-sagar.kadam@sifive.com>
 <1592745008-17196-2-git-send-email-sagar.kadam@sifive.com>
 <CAEUhbmUmQ4a4fRPhDtPD+0_z8iY2gotA23cM59Nw6yC71_wL2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <BYAPR13MB2614A807E5EE4FC44D471E8399950@BYAPR13MB2614.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <CAEUhbmXEf5nLi+05P1KsfJ7v3T-M1DRq79aUGu31KqDp4nmSsw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Sagar,

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 6:58 PM Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@sifive.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bin,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 6:50 AM
> > To: Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@sifive.com>
> > Cc: U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>; Rick Chen
> > <rick@andestech.com>; Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>; Jagan Teki
> > <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>; Pragnesh Patel
> > <pragnesh.patel@sifive.com>; Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>; Simon
> > Glass <sjg@chromium.org>; Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] fu540: prci: add request and free clock handlers
> >
> > [External Email] Do not click links or attachments unless you recognize the
> > sender and know the content is safe
> >
> > Hi Sagar,
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 9:10 PM Sagar Shrikant Kadam
> > <sagar.kadam@sifive.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Add clk_request handler to check if a valid clock is requested.
> > > Here clk_free handler is added for debug purpose which will display
> > > details of clock passed to clk_free.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sagar Shrikant Kadam <sagar.kadam@sifive.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Pragnesh Patel <Pragnesh.patel@sifive.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c
> > > b/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c index fe6e0d4..9a9ff6b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c
> > > @@ -686,6 +686,25 @@ static ulong sifive_fu540_prci_set_rate(struct clk
> > *clk, ulong rate)
> > >         return rate;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static int sifive_fu540_prci_clk_request(struct clk *clk) {
> > > +       debug("%s(clk=%p) (dev=%p, id=%lu)\n", __func__, clk, clk->dev,
> > > +             clk->id);
> > > +
> > > +       if (clk->id >= ARRAY_SIZE(__prci_init_clocks))
> > > +               return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +       return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int sifive_fu540_prci_clk_free(struct clk *clk) {
> > > +       debug("%s(clk=%p) (dev=%p, id=%lu)\n", __func__, clk, clk->dev,
> > > +             clk->id);
> > > +
> > > +       return 0;
> > > +}
> >
> > It seems these 2 routines do not actually do anything? Is this for debugging
> > purposes?
> >
> The sifive_fu540_prci_clk_request will check if the clock requested is valid or not.
> While the sifive_fu540_prci_clk_free function is just for debug.
> Is it ok if I retain these in V5 or you have some other thought here.
>

OK, but I suspect the parameter check in
sifive_fu540_prci_clk_request() is not necessary too as currently the
codes work well.

Regards,
Bin