From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bin Meng Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 20:43:07 +0800 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] i2c: designware_i2c: Add support for PCI(e) based I2C cores (x86) In-Reply-To: <56EFE346.4030008@denx.de> References: <1458287661-21745-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> <1458287661-21745-6-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> <56EFB8D2.5030306@denx.de> <56EFE346.4030008@denx.de> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Stefan, On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Stefan Roese wrote: > Hi Bin, > > On 21.03.2016 10:03, Stefan Roese wrote: > > > >>>> static int designware_i2c_probe_chip(struct udevice *bus, uint chip_addr, >>>> @@ -476,14 +519,45 @@ static int designware_i2c_probe(struct udevice *bus) >>>> { >>>> struct dw_i2c *priv = dev_get_priv(bus); >>>> >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86 >>>> + /* Save base address from PCI BAR */ >>>> + priv->regs = (struct i2c_regs *) >>>> + dm_pci_map_bar(bus, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, PCI_REGION_MEM); >>>> + /* Use BayTrail specific timing values */ >>>> + priv->scl_sda_cfg = &byt_config; >>>> +#else >>> >>> How about: >>> >>> if (device_is_on_pci_bus(dev)) { >>> do the PCI I2C stuff here; >>> } >> >> I've tried this but it generated compilation errors on socfpga, as the >> dm_pci_xxx functions are not available there. So it definitely needs >> some #ifdef here. I could go with your suggestion and use >> #if CONFIG_DM_PCI as well. >> >>> See driver/net/designware.c for example. >>> >>>> /* Save base address from device-tree */ >>>> priv->regs = (struct i2c_regs *)dev_get_addr(bus); >>>> +#endif > > Enabling this code for x86 via if (device_is_on_pci_bus(dev)) results > in this ugly compilation warning: > > drivers/i2c/designware_i2c.c: In function ?designware_i2c_probe?: > drivers/i2c/designware_i2c.c:530:16: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast] > priv->regs = (struct i2c_regs *)dev_get_addr(bus); > ^ > > This is because x86 defines fdt_addr_t / phys_addr_t as 64bit. So > I'm wondering, how dev_get_addr() should get used on x86. Has it > been used anywhere here at all? Should we perhaps go back to > a 32bit phy_addr representation again? So that dev_get_addr() > matches the (void *) size again? > dev_get_addr() is being used on x86 drivers. See ns16550_serial_ofdata_to_platdata() for example. There is no build warning for the ns16550 driver. > The other option would to just leave the code as in v1 so that > dev_get_addr() is not referenced on x86 here. > Regards, Bin