From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:36:16 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] x86: fsp: Replace e-mmc with emmc in devicetree bindings
In-Reply-To: <CAEUhbmUCJvcFiv2fpJBLbTWiEdsGY+chj-DKAmdRCk9R_CJCZA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200911145228.2314906-1-wolfgang.wallner@br-automation.com>
 <CAEUhbmUCJvcFiv2fpJBLbTWiEdsGY+chj-DKAmdRCk9R_CJCZA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAEUhbmXa=83PCY6v3=1rSn9+UOGFAO4PDNDG4KVSUUtxtRuJfA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 9:33 AM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 10:52 PM Wolfgang Wallner
> <wolfgang.wallner@br-automation.com> wrote:
> >
> > The term eMMC is used inconsistently within the FSP devicetree
> > bindigs (e-mmc and emmc), especially for "emmc-host-max-speed"
>
> typo: bindings
>
> I can fix this when applying

Fixed the typo, and

>
> > documentation and code disagree.
> >
> > Change all eMMC instances within the FSP bindings to consistently
> > use "emmc". The term "emmc" is already used a lot within U-Boot,
> > while "e-mmc" is only used in the FSP bindings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Wallner <wolfgang.wallner@br-automation.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> >  arch/x86/cpu/apollolake/fsp_bindings.c                 | 6 +++---
> >  doc/device-tree-bindings/fsp/fsp2/apollolake/fsp-m.txt | 2 +-
> >  doc/device-tree-bindings/fsp/fsp2/apollolake/fsp-s.txt | 2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>

applied to u-boot-x86, thanks!