From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bin Meng Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:27:09 +0800 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/10] x86: ivybridge: Add FSP support In-Reply-To: References: <1449831353-933-1-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com> <1449831353-933-3-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Simon, On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > On 11 December 2015 at 03:55, Bin Meng wrote: >> IvyBridge FSP package is built with a base address at 0xfff80000, >> and does not use UPD data region. This adds basic FSP support. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng >> --- >> >> arch/x86/cpu/ivybridge/Kconfig | 8 ++++ >> arch/x86/cpu/ivybridge/Makefile | 4 ++ >> arch/x86/cpu/ivybridge/fsp_configs.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/x86/cpu/ivybridge/ivybridge.c | 22 +++++++++++ >> .../include/asm/arch-ivybridge/fsp/fsp_configs.h | 40 +++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/x86/include/asm/arch-ivybridge/fsp/fsp_vpd.h | 12 ++++++ >> 6 files changed, 131 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 arch/x86/cpu/ivybridge/fsp_configs.c >> create mode 100644 arch/x86/cpu/ivybridge/ivybridge.c >> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/arch-ivybridge/fsp/fsp_configs.h >> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/arch-ivybridge/fsp/fsp_vpd.h > > Acked-by: Simon Glass > Tested on link (ivybridge non-FSP) > Tested-by: Simon Glass > > One question: why do we need an Intel license on this code? > It was a copy and paste from other platform (queensbay and baytrail) files. Do you think we should change it to GPLv2+? Regards, Bin