From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] platform/chrome: Standardize Chrome OS keyboard backlight name Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 11:55:27 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20190404171007.160878-1-ncrews@chromium.org> <20190404171007.160878-3-ncrews@chromium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Nick Crews Cc: Guenter Roeck , Enric Balletbo i Serra , Benson Leung , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Jacek Anaszewski , Pavel Machek , Alexandre Belloni , Alessandro Zummo , linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , Duncan Laurie , Simon Glass List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 11:41 AM Nick Crews wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 11:43 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:36 AM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:11 AM Nick Crews wrote: > > > > > > > > We want all backlights for the system keyboard to > > > > use a common name, so the name "platform::kbd_backlight" > > > > would be better than the current "chromeos::kbd_backlight" > > > > name. Normally this wouldn't be worth changing, but the new > > > > Wilco keyboard backlight driver uses the "platform" name. > > > > We want to make it so all Chrome OS devices are consistent, > > > > so we'll change the name here too. > > > > > > > > > > Wondering - who is the "we" you are talking about ? > > You're right, I should have been more precise. > I was referring to Pavel, Enric, and myself. Pavel had this opinion here: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/4/1040. I don't know what Pavel meant by "we" > in that comment, but I would guess that could mean the other LED maintainers > as well? I talked with Enric 1:1 and he didn't see the problem with changing it, > though perhaps he was only considering our use of the LED via powerd, > and not users in general. I'm guessing Pavel's and Enric's meanings though, > excuse me if I am misinterpreting. > > > > > This also has a potential of breaking existing setups if somebody did > > happen to match on entire name instead of suffix. Such changes have to > > be considered very carefully; at this point I am against of doing > > this. > > Would it make sense to keep the old name as is, and only make the new > Wilco name begin with "platform:"? What would you think is best? Given that we do not have a single instance of platform::kbd_backlight in kernel at this time I have no idea why Pavel is trying to push this for Wilco driver. Thanks. -- Dmitry