On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 8:53 PM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:

> Hi Li, Xu,
>
> > > In fact, we don't have mandatory rules that TAPSS or TFAIL only can
> > > occur one time. a example ie memcontrol02.c
>
> > Right, that is my hesitant part for counting that.
> > Seems many tests abuse the TPASS|TFAIL for defining test fail bound.
>
> OK, while it'd be useful for some tests, it'd be confusing due this for
> other.
> I guess printing (tst_test->tcnt * test_variants) number can be confusing
> either.
>

Agree, so we might need more time coming up with a better solution.
Or, we go another way to limit the abuse in TPASS|TFAIL in the test.

But both sound not easy at this moment.

-- 
Regards,
Li Wang