Hi Li, Xu,
> > In fact, we don't have mandatory rules that TAPSS or TFAIL only can
> > occur one time. a example ie memcontrol02.c
> Right, that is my hesitant part for counting that.
> Seems many tests abuse the TPASS|TFAIL for defining test fail bound.
OK, while it'd be useful for some tests, it'd be confusing due this for other.
I guess printing (tst_test->tcnt * test_variants) number can be confusing
either.
Agree, so we might need more time coming up with a better solution.
Or, we go another way to limit the abuse in TPASS|TFAIL in the test.
But both sound not easy at this moment.