From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60816C433F5 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2022 04:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81733C9834 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2022 05:10:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E427F3C06E0 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2022 05:10:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4136600681 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2022 05:10:03 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1644207002; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qYDgqR3dBnocdUHbMyzSRw0aRNJpva6E8eruANR3W28=; b=Qd6e/YW4jKTloJtNUZDXPnuq33kWTheUQiRET4RL9HRQcBIxaBvT32JitYY5YhlRHcVGbF bjF/woV5N3FBWiUMjELdHSsP8Q7GvrBWaYBfNm3rynHRP+XyAh0KJDhcs6AoTy9OYdMtV1 Xhxu/r1iascyrzfMBDRcptzKYvqDlY8= Received: from mail-yb1-f199.google.com (mail-yb1-f199.google.com [209.85.219.199]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-62-TsA02XOsMniLw25Gsujz4Q-1; Sun, 06 Feb 2022 23:10:00 -0500 X-MC-Unique: TsA02XOsMniLw25Gsujz4Q-1 Received: by mail-yb1-f199.google.com with SMTP id m10-20020a25800a000000b0061daa5b7151so3690060ybk.10 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2022 20:10:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qYDgqR3dBnocdUHbMyzSRw0aRNJpva6E8eruANR3W28=; b=F3GP3BOK5mXFM7V1BAL3LazRevQ8P7Ws0AG8c/uHjVsVDVw/PV/cf+mFWyfh+BijMj SvYZvvihr5Z0wlv1BKT3JeyNwFvwbEPYMjAqGGQmpruOPPvu4s9qc6esUXkIA65Zqa+P Hu9ALdnfawRBrhxAF7PCXwZAgGq0ntUZV4MbYqqnC92P+Ztp1LkNgVPG+TrIJKXqLaxu j2Jsfm/QhhIf3gmM9qm0mihCPnR4ObAWPxnXEW1mfhLp1HAUs0seBxAaXaVrV31YRmAd 5xitctW3Kl4li3st1mU3sCLg+ZpzfogrXqSCBSmuiWH9Q0wCdhfFN2oXXoD4xCataddd VOlg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532JH5V8ZNALy0bw+WG/vw7z+B1ng56yEqiIEnICh0Qv1F4BCmDW COouCq4jcIC/2VfvZXESxePAl+x+FvUZo6gv2bsm0+p+MiqD/YAkJrjnW1qVjzkyK9HuHZySj1m lMpOOuxEWgEvvgQEPg6yRvc3KmVs= X-Received: by 2002:a81:3e20:: with SMTP id l32mr9556391ywa.208.1644207000035; Sun, 06 Feb 2022 20:10:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXjimRCBk57BxKEPA/FNgGZPte2OWocd8hRkdiuKKJBsPINHhQFJw0htgb7kD7hVYL8LhGQqSQzjuagpNmAIk= X-Received: by 2002:a81:3e20:: with SMTP id l32mr9556374ywa.208.1644206999772; Sun, 06 Feb 2022 20:09:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220127171455.9809-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <61F609C7.1080803@fujitsu.com> <620095ED.1040808@fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <620095ED.1040808@fujitsu.com> From: Li Wang Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 12:09:47 +0800 Message-ID: To: "xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com" Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=liwan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-2.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC PATCH 1/1] lib: Print in summary also tests not run at all X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "ltp@lists.linux.it" Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1993643313==" Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" --===============1993643313== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000028b5d105d765c689" --00000000000028b5d105d765c689 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com wrote: > In fact, we don't have mandatory rules that TAPSS or TFAIL only can > occur one time. a example ie memcontrol02.c > Right, that is my hesitant part for counting that. Seems many tests abuse the TPASS|TFAIL for defining test fail bound. -- Regards, Li Wang --00000000000028b5d105d765c689 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=C2=A0
In fact, we don't have mandatory rules that TAPSS or TFAIL only can occur one time. a example ie memcontrol02.c

=
Right, that is my he= sitant part for counting that.=C2=A0
Seems many tests abuse the TPASS|TFAIL for defining t= est fail bound.

--
Regards,
Li Wang
--00000000000028b5d105d765c689-- --===============1993643313== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp --===============1993643313==--