From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Li Wang Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:21:30 +0800 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/3] controllers/memcg: fixes for newer kernels In-Reply-To: References: <20210617070730.7699-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 3:31 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski < krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> wrote: > On 17/06/2021 09:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is a resend of previous Github pull: > > https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/pull/830 > > > > The patches fix several test failures we are hitting since months, see: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1829979 > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1829984 > > > > Best regards, > > Krzysztof > > > > > > Krzysztof Kozlowski (3): > > controllers/memcg: accept range of max_usage_in_bytes > > controllers/memcg: accept range of usage_in_bytes > > controllers/memcg: accept non-zero max_usage_in_bytes after reset > > > Hi everyone, > > The patchset got positive LGTM on the Github. Any further comments for > it or can it be applied? > I slightly agree with Richard that we need an explanation/investigation on where the 32*PAGE_SIZE comes from. Otherwise, we are very possible to mask a counter bug if only to make the test happy. Forgive me pour cold water on the method though it looks good in coding:). -- Regards, Li Wang -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: