From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Li Wang Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:29:46 +0800 Subject: [LTP] LTP release In-Reply-To: <20170424162534.GA13616@rei.lan> References: <20170424162534.GA13616@rei.lan> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi, On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > Hi! > It's about a time we should prepare for another release, hence as > usuall, lets start with pointing out any patches that should be part of > it and I would like to start with pre-release testing at the end of this > week. Does that sound OK to everyone? ioctl06 always failed on aarch64(others PASS) with upstream kernel-4.11-rc[1-7]. Not sure if it is a bug or not, since i'm still on debugging way. Just report here to let you know this. # uname -rm 4.11.0-rc7 aarch64 # ./ioctl06 tst_device.c:82: INFO: Found free device '/dev/loop1' tst_test.c:847: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s ioctl06.c:37: INFO: BLKRAGET original value 256 ioctl06.c:44: PASS: BLKRASET 0 read back correctly ioctl06.c:46: FAIL: BLKRASET 64 read back 0 ioctl06.c:44: PASS: BLKRASET 128 read back correctly ioctl06.c:46: FAIL: BLKRASET 192 read back 128 ioctl06.c:44: PASS: BLKRASET 256 read back correctly ioctl06.c:46: FAIL: BLKRASET 320 read back 256 ioctl06.c:44: PASS: BLKRASET 384 read back correctly ioctl06.c:46: FAIL: BLKRASET 448 read back 384 ioctl06.c:44: PASS: BLKRASET 512 read back correctly ioctl06.c:49: INFO: BLKRASET restoring original value 256 Summary: passed 5 failed 4 skipped 0 warnings 0 -- Regards, Li Wang Email: liwang@redhat.com