On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 10:04 PM Richard Palethorpe via ltp <
ltp@lists.linux.it> wrote:

> With the current naming it is common to have 'group' repeated 3 or
> even 4 times in one line. This causes a number of readability
> problems. Renaming it to cg reduces the amount of repetition.
>
> The one place it is not renamed is in tst_test because it won't cause
> repetition there. Meanwhile it is easier to search the internet for
> 'linux cgroup' than 'linux cg'.
>
> Li Wang suggested renaming tst_cg to tst_cg_test because it is
> consistent with tst_cg_drain. However I think tst_cg is used so often
> that it is more important to have shorter lines.
>

To be honest, I only wanted that tst_cg_test pointer :).

But I have no objection to renaming 'tst_cgroup_*' to 'tst_cg_*'
for the whole APIs. (Though I don't like it)

Let's hear more voices from peers.

-- 
Regards,
Li Wang