On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 11:27 PM Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> wrote:

> Hi!
> > To be honest, I only wanted that tst_cg_test pointer :).
> >
> > But I have no objection to renaming 'tst_cgroup_*' to 'tst_cg_*'
> > for the whole APIs. (Though I don't like it)
> >
> > Let's hear more voices from peers.
>
> Actually I like it, having the common prefix shortened to just tst_cg_
> makes it easier to read, at least for me.
>

Well, two to one, thanks for the comments :).

@Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>  Hi Richard,
Feel free to push 1/3 and 2/3 patches, in case someone (I guess Luke)
waiting for the code rebase on it.

We can hold patch 3/3(memcontrol04) for a while for fail debugging.
(I am involved in another stuff these days, will look back on that soon)


-- 
Regards,
Li Wang