On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 11:27 PM Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> wrote:

Hi!
> To be honest, I only wanted that tst_cg_test pointer :).
>
> But I have no objection to renaming 'tst_cgroup_*' to 'tst_cg_*'
> for the whole APIs. (Though I don't like it)
>
> Let's hear more voices from peers.

Actually I like it, having the common prefix shortened to just tst_cg_
makes it easier to read, at least for me.

Well, two to one, thanks for the comments :).

@Richard Palethorpe Hi Richard,

Feel free to push 1/3 and 2/3 patches, in case someone (I guess Luke)

waiting for the code rebase on it.

We can hold patch 3/3(memcontrol04) for a while for fail debugging.

(I am involved in another stuff these days, will look back on that soon)

Regards,

Li Wang